Examiner Michael Caley

Grant ratio: 64.0% (46th percentile in Art Unit 2871 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.00. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 64.0%
Average office actions / grant 2.00
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
79712
Primary art unit
2871
Work group
2870
Technology center
2800
Applications
469
Granted applications
300
Examiner phone
(571) 272-2286
Supervisor
Allana Bidder
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-5560

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 44 58.4% 1.93
Group 352 60.5% 1.71
Tech Center 2,435 61.3% 1.69
USPTO 16,620 51.8% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.93 905 office actions across 469 applications
Applications with office actions 98.3% 461 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 8 1.7%
1 OA 212 45.2%
2 OAs 147 31.3%
3 OAs 55 11.7%
4 OAs 25 5.3%
5+ OAs 22 4.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 69.6% 2008 2009: 67.9% 2009 2010: 79.7% 2010 2011: 75.6% 2011 2012: 74.6% 2012 2013: 70.8% 2013 2014: 60.6% 2014 2015: 31.7% 2015 2016: 0.0% 2016 2018: 100.0% 2018 2020: 0.0% 2020 2025: 11.1% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008463269.6%
2009563867.9%
2010645179.7%
2011413175.6%
2012634774.6%
2013654670.8%
2014664060.6%
2015411331.7%
2016400.0%
201811100.0%
2020100.0%
20259111.1%
20261200.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 461 0.2% 6.1% 92.0% 0.2%
Action 2 249 0.0% 5.6% 92.0% 1.6%
Action 3 102 0.0% 2.9% 93.1% 0.0%
Action 4 47 0.0% 0.0% 97.9% 0.0%
Action 5 22 0.0% 0.0% 95.5% 4.5%
Action 6 14 0.0% 7.1% 85.7% 0.0%
Action 7 7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 31 office actions
All years 0.1% 1 of 905 office actions
Change -0.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-23–2026-10-23. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 1. Merits outcomes: 0 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
100.0% 1/1 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
100.0% 1/1 decisions
Median appeal duration
31.3 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 23, 2013 11/689,105 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 30, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.