Examiner Robert E. Tallman

Grant ratio: 75.5% (72nd percentile in Art Unit 2872 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.66. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 75.5%
Average office actions / grant 1.66
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
88711
Primary art unit
2872
Work group
2870
Technology center
2800
Applications
764
Granted applications
577
Examiner phone
(571) 270-3958
Supervisor
Ricky Mack
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-2333

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 102 61.9% 1.70
Group 351 61.2% 1.71
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.59 1,217 office actions across 764 applications
Applications with office actions 97.9% 748 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 16 2.1%
1 OA 481 63.0%
2 OAs 164 21.5%
3 OAs 46 6.0%
4 OAs 34 4.5%
5+ OAs 23 3.0%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2012: 65.0% 2012 2013: 80.9% 2013 2014: 68.9% 2014 2015: 68.3% 2015 2016: 63.3% 2016 2017: 75.0% 2017 2018: 82.6% 2018 2019: 84.0% 2019 2020: 87.0% 2020 2021: 88.9% 2021 2022: 75.6% 2022 2023: 92.0% 2023 2024: 95.7% 2024 2025: 50.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2012201365.0%
2013473880.9%
2014453168.9%
2015412868.3%
2016603863.3%
2017644875.0%
2018695782.6%
2019756384.0%
2020776787.0%
2021635688.9%
2022413175.6%
2023504692.0%
2024474595.7%
2025321650.0%
20263300.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 748 1.1% 30.9% 60.6% 5.9%
Action 2 267 0.0% 15.7% 78.3% 5.6%
Action 3 103 0.0% 5.8% 93.2% 1.0%
Action 4 57 0.0% 7.0% 89.5% 3.5%
Action 5 23 0.0% 0.0% 95.7% 4.3%
Action 6 10 0.0% 0.0% 90.0% 10.0%
Action 7 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 2.2% 3 of 134 office actions
All years 0.7% 8 of 1,217 office actions
Change +1.6 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
1.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
1.1%
1.4%
2.1%
1.9%
2024: AI examples
2.1%
2025: August memo
3.0%
2.9%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
25.0% 1/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
75.0% 3/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
17.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 28, 2020 13/587,989 Reversed §103
Jul. 24, 2020 14/552,584 Affirmed §103
Feb. 22, 2017 13/141,161 Affirmed in part §100 · §102 · §103
Aug. 19, 2016 13/082,427 Affirmed in part §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.