Examiner Nicholas R Pasko

Grant ratio: 55.8% (35th percentile in Art Unit 2872 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.26. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 55.8%
Average office actions / grant 2.26
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
90559
Primary art unit
2872
Work group
2870
Technology center
2800
Applications
636
Granted applications
355
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1876
Supervisor
William Kraig
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-8660

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 102 61.9% 1.70
Group 351 61.2% 1.71
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.22 1,415 office actions across 636 applications
Applications with office actions 96.5% 614 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 22 3.5%
1 OA 254 39.9%
2 OAs 159 25.0%
3 OAs 73 11.5%
4 OAs 64 10.1%
5+ OAs 64 10.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2013: 44.4% 2013 2014: 64.1% 2014 2015: 33.9% 2015 2016: 48.8% 2016 2017: 62.7% 2017 2018: 71.6% 2018 2019: 76.3% 2019 2020: 72.6% 2020 2021: 68.1% 2021 2022: 65.5% 2022 2023: 67.6% 2023 2024: 78.6% 2024 2025: 27.8% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20139444.4%
2014392564.1%
2015592033.9%
2016412048.8%
2017593762.7%
2018674871.6%
2019594576.3%
2020624572.6%
2021473268.1%
2022291965.5%
2023342367.6%
2024282278.6%
2025541527.8%
20264900.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 614 0.0% 12.2% 80.5% 3.7%
Action 2 360 0.3% 35.6% 55.3% 3.1%
Action 3 201 0.5% 31.3% 63.7% 3.0%
Action 4 128 0.0% 18.0% 78.1% 3.1%
Action 5 64 0.0% 14.1% 82.8% 3.1%
Action 6 29 0.0% 6.9% 86.2% 0.0%
Action 7 7 0.0% 0.0% 85.7% 14.3%
Action 8 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 221 office actions
All years 0.1% 2 of 1,415 office actions
Change -0.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
2014: Alice
0.8%
0.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
12.5% 1/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
37.5% 3/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
13.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 27, 2024 17/218,183 Affirmed §103
Apr. 14, 2022 15/874,048 Affirmed §103 · §112
Nov. 25, 2019 14/884,975 Affirmed in part §103 · §112
Jan. 18, 2019 13/903,277 Affirmed N/A
Sep. 20, 2018 14/493,826 Affirmed in part §103
Mar. 29, 2018 13/853,804 Affirmed §103
Jan. 30, 2018 13/766,025 Reversed §102 · §103
Dec. 7, 2017 13/688,102 Affirmed §102 · §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.