Examiner Hargobind S. Sawhney

Grant ratio: 72.0% (72nd percentile in Art Unit 2875 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.95. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: February 2019
Grant ratio 72.0%
Average office actions / grant 1.95
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
76183
Primary art unit
2875
Work group
2870
Technology center
2800
Applications
610
Granted applications
439

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 63 60.1% 1.81
Group 351 61.2% 1.71
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.90 1,214 office actions across 639 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 639 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 322 50.4%
2 OAs 184 28.8%
3 OAs 66 10.3%
4 OAs 36 5.6%
5+ OAs 31 4.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 44.0% 2008 2009: 67.3% 2009 2010: 76.2% 2010 2011: 68.1% 2011 2012: 70.8% 2012 2013: 72.9% 2013 2014: 71.4% 2014 2015: 73.0% 2015 2016: 80.0% 2016 2017: 76.3% 2017 2018: 87.9% 2018 2019: 85.7% 2019

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008502244.0%
2009523567.3%
2010211676.2%
2011473268.1%
2012654670.8%
2013705172.9%
2014634571.4%
2015634673.0%
2016554480.0%
2017594576.3%
2018585187.9%
20197685.7%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 639 0.2% 14.9% 66.2% 15.8%
Action 2 317 0.6% 7.3% 75.7% 14.5%
Action 3 133 0.8% 2.3% 78.9% 16.5%
Action 4 67 0.0% 4.5% 80.6% 11.9%
Action 5 31 0.0% 3.2% 80.6% 12.9%
Action 6 13 0.0% 0.0% 84.6% 7.7%
Action 7 6 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 33.3%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.3% 4 of 1,214 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
1.8%
0.9%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
42.9% 3/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
57.1% 4/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
27.9 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
May. 8, 2017 13/188,897 Affirmed New ground of rejection §103
Feb. 27, 2014 11/451,412 Reversed N/A
Jul. 29, 2013 10/650,537 Affirmed in part N/A
Jul. 25, 2013 11/199,956 Affirmed N/A
Jul. 3, 2013 10/833,570 Affirmed N/A
Nov. 13, 2012 09/829,033 Reversed §103
Jul. 20, 2012 11/323,637 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.