Examiner Mark Tsidulko

Grant ratio: 37.4% (6th percentile in Art Unit 2875 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.78. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: September 2018
Grant ratio 37.4%
Average office actions / grant 2.78
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
79134
Primary art unit
2875
Work group
2870
Technology center
2800
Applications
479
Granted applications
179

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 63 60.1% 1.81
Group 351 61.2% 1.71
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.68 1,381 office actions across 515 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 515 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 180 35.0%
2 OAs 142 27.6%
3 OAs 58 11.3%
4 OAs 61 11.8%
5+ OAs 74 14.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 50.0% 2008 2009: 44.6% 2009 2010: 30.0% 2010 2011: 36.4% 2011 2012: 28.6% 2012 2013: 30.8% 2013 2014: 26.1% 2014 2015: 29.4% 2015 2016: 34.5% 2016 2017: 35.6% 2017 2018: 80.0% 2018

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008281450.0%
2009562544.6%
2010501530.0%
2011441636.4%
2012561628.6%
2013391230.8%
2014461226.1%
2015511529.4%
2016291034.5%
2017451635.6%
2018352880.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 515 0.0% 1.2% 97.1% 0.8%
Action 2 335 0.0% 1.2% 97.9% 0.6%
Action 3 193 0.0% 1.0% 97.9% 0.5%
Action 4 135 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 5 74 0.0% 0.0% 98.6% 1.4%
Action 6 48 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 29 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 23 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 11 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 9 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 1,381 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 11. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 6 reversed.

Full reversal rate
54.5% 6/11 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
63.6% 7/11 decisions
Median appeal duration
23.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 30, 2019 12/579,856 Reversed §103
Sep. 30, 2019 13/891,619 Reversed §103
Jun. 26, 2019 14/259,936 Affirmed N/A
Dec. 27, 2016 11/825,912 Reversed §103
Apr. 28, 2016 13/074,322 Affirmed in part §102 · §103 · §112
Mar. 24, 2015 12/291,022 Reversed N/A
May. 21, 2014 11/596,932 Reversed N/A
Feb. 28, 2014 11/772,522 Affirmed §103
Jan. 8, 2014 11/574,912 Affirmed N/A
Mar. 27, 2013 11/801,016 Affirmed §103
Sep. 29, 2010 11/020,998 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.