Examiner Omar Rojas Cadima

Grant ratio: 64.7% (47th percentile in Art Unit 2875 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.98. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 64.7%
Average office actions / grant 1.98
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
91085
Primary art unit
2875
Work group
2870
Technology center
2800
Applications
626
Granted applications
405
Examiner phone
(571) 272-8007
Supervisor
Abdulmajeed Aziz
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-5046

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 63 60.1% 1.81
Group 351 61.2% 1.71
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.04 1,275 office actions across 626 applications
Applications with office actions 99.7% 624 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 2 0.3%
1 OA 273 43.6%
2 OAs 189 30.2%
3 OAs 80 12.8%
4 OAs 56 8.9%
5+ OAs 26 4.2%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2014: 26.3% 2014 2015: 47.5% 2015 2016: 52.3% 2016 2017: 52.8% 2017 2018: 51.4% 2018 2019: 57.8% 2019 2020: 78.3% 2020 2021: 81.8% 2021 2022: 87.7% 2022 2023: 82.8% 2023 2024: 84.3% 2024 2025: 72.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201419526.3%
2015401947.5%
2016442352.3%
2017532852.8%
2018371951.4%
2019452657.8%
2020604778.3%
2021554581.8%
2022575087.7%
2023584882.8%
2024705984.3%
2025503672.0%
20263800.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 624 0.2% 8.0% 88.1% 2.1%
Action 2 351 0.0% 5.1% 89.5% 4.0%
Action 3 162 0.0% 2.5% 94.4% 1.2%
Action 4 82 0.0% 3.7% 93.9% 1.2%
Action 5 26 0.0% 3.8% 92.3% 0.0%
Action 6 16 0.0% 12.5% 75.0% 6.3%
Action 7 7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 33.3%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 290 office actions
All years 0.1% 1 of 1,275 office actions
Change -0.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 2/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 2/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
9.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 30, 2021 16/001,314 Reversed §102
Sep. 22, 2020 16/031,195 Reversed §102 · §103
Aug. 2, 2019 14/076,711 Affirmed §102 · §103 · §112
May. 29, 2018 14/264,598 Affirmed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.