Examiner Christopher E Dunay

Grant ratio: 65.8% (53rd percentile in Art Unit 2875 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.63. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 65.8%
Average office actions / grant 1.63
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
91087
Primary art unit
2875
Work group
2870
Technology center
2800
Applications
774
Granted applications
509
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1222
Supervisor
Kara Geisel
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-2416

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 63 60.1% 1.81
Group 351 61.2% 1.71
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.66 1,285 office actions across 774 applications
Applications with office actions 99.6% 771 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 3 0.4%
1 OA 472 61.0%
2 OAs 179 23.1%
3 OAs 63 8.1%
4 OAs 32 4.1%
5+ OAs 25 3.2%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2014: 29.6% 2014 2015: 44.7% 2015 2016: 64.3% 2016 2017: 46.9% 2017 2018: 64.7% 2018 2019: 76.2% 2019 2020: 60.3% 2020 2021: 86.0% 2021 2022: 89.9% 2022 2023: 90.8% 2023 2024: 90.1% 2024 2025: 48.8% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201427829.6%
2015381744.7%
2016422764.3%
2017492346.9%
2018513364.7%
2019634876.2%
2020583560.3%
2021504386.0%
2022696289.9%
202312010990.8%
2024716490.1%
2025824048.8%
20265400.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 771 0.3% 6.4% 76.0% 11.0%
Action 2 299 0.0% 3.0% 89.0% 7.0%
Action 3 120 0.0% 3.3% 88.3% 8.3%
Action 4 57 0.0% 1.8% 94.7% 3.5%
Action 5 25 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 6 8 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.7% 2 of 288 office actions
All years 0.2% 2 of 1,285 office actions
Change +0.5 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
2.2%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 2. Merits outcomes: 0 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 1/2 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
100.0% 2/2 decisions
Median appeal duration
14.9 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jan. 26, 2021 15/454,525 Reversed §103
Sep. 28, 2017 13/653,999 Affirmed in part §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.