Examiner Rebecca Carole Bryant

Grant ratio: 57.0% (50th percentile in Art Unit 2877 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.40. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 57.0%
Average office actions / grant 2.40
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
82844
Primary art unit
2877
Work group
2870
Technology center
2800
Applications
597
Granted applications
340
Examiner phone
(571) 272-9787
Supervisor
Uzma Alam
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-3995

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 54 58.5% 1.47
Group 352 60.7% 1.71
Tech Center 2,428 61.6% 1.69
USPTO 16,572 52.1% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.35 1,404 office actions across 597 applications
Applications with office actions 99.3% 593 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 4 0.7%
1 OA 228 38.2%
2 OAs 179 30.0%
3 OAs 64 10.7%
4 OAs 61 10.2%
5+ OAs 61 10.2%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 57.1% 2008 2009: 64.6% 2009 2010: 51.9% 2010 2011: 35.9% 2011 2012: 44.4% 2012 2013: 44.2% 2013 2014: 65.4% 2014 2015: 63.2% 2015 2016: 44.4% 2016 2017: 76.9% 2017 2018: 80.0% 2018 2019: 85.7% 2019 2020: 87.5% 2020 2021: 75.9% 2021 2022: 78.6% 2022 2023: 76.5% 2023 2024: 65.2% 2024 2025: 33.3% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008492857.1%
2009483164.6%
2010271451.9%
2011391435.9%
201218844.4%
2013431944.2%
2014261765.4%
2015191263.2%
201618844.4%
2017262076.9%
2018302480.0%
2019211885.7%
2020242187.5%
2021292275.9%
2022423378.6%
2023342676.5%
2024231565.2%
2025301033.3%
20265100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 593 0.7% 12.5% 72.0% 9.8%
Action 2 365 1.1% 14.2% 70.7% 11.8%
Action 3 186 1.1% 11.8% 76.3% 9.1%
Action 4 122 1.6% 9.0% 80.3% 8.2%
Action 5 61 1.6% 8.2% 83.6% 4.9%
Action 6 29 3.4% 3.4% 75.9% 13.8%
Action 7 18 5.6% 5.6% 83.3% 5.6%
Action 8 12 0.0% 16.7% 66.7% 16.7%
Action 9 8 0.0% 12.5% 62.5% 25.0%
Action 10 5 0.0% 0.0% 80.0% 20.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.9% 2 of 233 office actions
All years 1.1% 15 of 1,404 office actions
Change -0.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-02–2026-10-02. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
2.3%
1.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
1.8%
3.1%
3.5%
3.4%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.9%
1.0%
2024: AI examples
1.8%
2025: August memo
1.2%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
40.0% 2/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
80.0% 4/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
14.7 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jul. 8, 2025 16/969,775 Affirmed in part §103 · §112
Mar. 9, 2023 16/299,461 Affirmed in part N/A
Dec. 27, 2019 14/809,774 Reversed §101 · §103
May. 20, 2014 11/542,802 Reversed N/A
Mar. 25, 2013 11/256,377 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 9, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.