Examiner Thomas A. Hollweg

Grant ratio: 51.8% (21st percentile in Art Unit 2879 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.33. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 51.8%
Average office actions / grant 2.33
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
83286
Primary art unit
2879
Work group
2870
Technology center
2800
Applications
465
Granted applications
241
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1739
Supervisor
Matthew W Such
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-1570

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 17 64.2% 1.76
Group 351 61.2% 1.71
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.07 968 office actions across 467 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 467 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 203 43.5%
2 OAs 142 30.4%
3 OAs 60 12.8%
4 OAs 30 6.4%
5+ OAs 32 6.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 35.3% 2008 2009: 36.4% 2009 2010: 51.9% 2010 2011: 56.9% 2011 2012: 53.3% 2012 2013: 58.9% 2013 2014: 69.9% 2014 2015: 88.9% 2015 2017: 75.0% 2017 2024: 100.0% 2024 2025: 12.5% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008511835.3%
2009552036.4%
2010542851.9%
2011653756.9%
2012603253.3%
2013563358.9%
2014735169.9%
2015181688.9%
20174375.0%
202422100.0%
20258112.5%
20261900.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 467 0.0% 11.1% 83.7% 2.6%
Action 2 264 0.0% 7.2% 87.5% 3.4%
Action 3 122 0.0% 6.6% 89.3% 4.1%
Action 4 62 0.0% 3.2% 88.7% 8.1%
Action 5 32 0.0% 6.3% 90.6% 3.1%
Action 6 14 0.0% 7.1% 85.7% 7.1%
Action 7 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 38 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 968 office actions
Change 0.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
25.0% 1/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
25.0% 1/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
25.3 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jul. 12, 2017 11/954,628 Affirmed §103
Apr. 7, 2016 13/524,188 Reversed §103
Nov. 10, 2014 12/360,407 Affirmed N/A
Apr. 15, 2013 11/481,145 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.