Examiner David A Vanore

Grant ratio: 83.4% (88th percentile in Art Unit 2881 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.27. Most common rejection type: §102.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 83.4%
Average office actions / grant 1.27
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
78600
Primary art unit
2881
Work group
2880
Technology center
2800
Applications
1,267
Granted applications
1,057
Examiner phone
(571) 272-2483
Supervisor
Robert Kim
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-2293

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 30 56.3% 1.64
Group 164 64.9% 1.71
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.30 1,648 office actions across 1,267 applications
Applications with office actions 99.5% 1,261 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 6 0.5%
1 OA 975 77.0%
2 OAs 217 17.1%
3 OAs 50 3.9%
4 OAs 11 0.9%
5+ OAs 8 0.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 73.8% 2008 2009: 76.3% 2009 2010: 86.7% 2010 2011: 96.4% 2011 2012: 91.2% 2012 2013: 85.7% 2013 2014: 91.3% 2014 2015: 96.3% 2015 2016: 85.5% 2016 2017: 98.6% 2017 2018: 88.9% 2018 2019: 93.8% 2019 2020: 89.4% 2020 2021: 98.8% 2021 2022: 87.5% 2022 2023: 88.2% 2023 2024: 76.1% 2024 2025: 61.8% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008423173.8%
2009806176.3%
2010605286.7%
2011555396.4%
2012575291.2%
2013564885.7%
2014464291.3%
2015545296.3%
2016554785.5%
2017727198.6%
2018908088.9%
2019817693.8%
2020948489.4%
2021858498.8%
2022726387.5%
2023686088.2%
2024715476.1%
2025764761.8%
20265300.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,261 14.2% 38.7% 13.5% 24.4%
Action 2 286 16.8% 27.6% 12.9% 30.8%
Action 3 69 23.2% 20.3% 24.6% 26.1%
Action 4 19 15.8% 15.8% 42.1% 31.6%
Action 5 8 0.0% 25.0% 25.0% 25.0%
Action 6 2 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%
Action 7 1 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 26.5% 78 of 294 office actions
All years 14.9% 246 of 1,648 office actions
Change +11.6 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

4.2%
3.7%
9.9%
12.3%
23.0%
23.2%
2014: Alice
18.0%
11.7%
16.9%
12.6%
10.7%
2019: PEG
9.2%
11.5%
5.0%
21.8%
18.6%
2024: AI examples
31.0%
2025: August memo
26.0%
21.3%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 2. Merits outcomes: 0 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
100.0% 2/2 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
100.0% 2/2 decisions
Median appeal duration
11.4 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 13, 2024 17/199,300 Reversed §101
May. 5, 2023 16/714,549 Reversed §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.