Examiner Michael Maskell

Grant ratio: 83.3% (84th percentile in Art Unit 2881 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.51. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 83.3%
Average office actions / grant 1.51
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
83786
Primary art unit
2881
Work group
2880
Technology center
2800
Applications
1,093
Granted applications
910
Examiner phone
(571) 270-3210
Supervisor
Robert Kim
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-2293

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 30 56.3% 1.64
Group 164 64.9% 1.71
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.50 1,636 office actions across 1,093 applications
Applications with office actions 99.9% 1,092 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.1%
1 OA 733 67.1%
2 OAs 251 23.0%
3 OAs 59 5.4%
4 OAs 31 2.8%
5+ OAs 18 1.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 74.0% 2008 2009: 72.3% 2009 2010: 77.9% 2010 2011: 83.1% 2011 2012: 88.0% 2012 2013: 86.4% 2013 2014: 90.2% 2014 2015: 85.5% 2015 2016: 83.6% 2016 2017: 94.6% 2017 2018: 92.5% 2018 2019: 92.4% 2019 2020: 89.1% 2020 2021: 96.7% 2021 2022: 94.1% 2022 2023: 93.1% 2023 2024: 84.2% 2024 2025: 51.4% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008503774.0%
2009654772.3%
2010776077.9%
2011715983.1%
2012504488.0%
2013595186.4%
2014615590.2%
2015554785.5%
2016736183.6%
2017747094.6%
2018534992.5%
2019666192.4%
2020645789.1%
2021615996.7%
2022514894.1%
2023585493.1%
2024383284.2%
2025371951.4%
20263000.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,092 2.6% 29.1% 61.7% 2.2%
Action 2 359 3.1% 20.1% 70.8% 3.1%
Action 3 108 0.9% 13.9% 80.6% 2.8%
Action 4 49 2.0% 8.2% 83.7% 6.1%
Action 5 18 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 6 8 0.0% 0.0% 87.5% 0.0%
Action 7 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 4.8% 7 of 147 office actions
All years 2.5% 41 of 1,636 office actions
Change +2.3 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
2.8%
2.0%
4.8%
1.2%
2014: Alice
5.0%
1.2%
2.5%
0.0%
2.8%
2019: PEG
2.6%
3.3%
1.4%
5.7%
4.7%
2024: AI examples
2.5%
2025: August memo
10.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
42.9% 3/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
42.9% 3/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
14.0 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jul. 16, 2025 17/236,178 Affirmed §103
Nov. 18, 2024 16/577,279 Affirmed §103
Apr. 27, 2023 16/587,645 Reversed New ground of rejection §101 · §103 · §112
Sep. 16, 2019 14/780,077 Reversed §102
Dec. 17, 2013 11/119,230 Reversed N/A
May. 29, 2013 11/442,232 Affirmed §103
Feb. 21, 2013 11/301,324 Affirmed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.