Examiner Ryan Howard

Grant ratio: 74.3% (52nd percentile in Art Unit 2882 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.44. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 74.3%
Average office actions / grant 1.44
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
85157
Primary art unit
2882
Work group
2880
Technology center
2800
Applications
1,056
Granted applications
785
Examiner phone
(571) 270-5358
Supervisor
Minh-Toan Ton
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-2303

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 22 70.6% 1.84
Group 164 64.9% 1.71
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.46 1,539 office actions across 1,056 applications
Applications with office actions 99.9% 1,055 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.1%
1 OA 755 71.5%
2 OAs 193 18.3%
3 OAs 56 5.3%
4 OAs 38 3.6%
5+ OAs 13 1.2%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 39.1% 2008 2009: 50.0% 2009 2010: 59.3% 2010 2011: 68.4% 2011 2012: 48.1% 2012 2013: 67.2% 2013 2014: 72.7% 2014 2015: 89.4% 2015 2016: 90.5% 2016 2017: 92.5% 2017 2018: 93.7% 2018 2019: 93.5% 2019 2020: 92.1% 2020 2021: 85.0% 2021 2022: 88.9% 2022 2023: 90.6% 2023 2024: 93.5% 2024 2025: 42.6% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200823939.1%
2009562850.0%
2010543259.3%
2011382668.4%
2012542648.1%
2013614167.2%
2014554072.7%
2015665989.4%
2016635790.5%
2017807492.5%
2018635993.7%
2019625893.5%
2020383592.1%
2021605185.0%
2022544888.9%
2023645890.6%
2024625893.5%
2025612642.6%
20264200.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,055 0.4% 12.9% 64.2% 9.4%
Action 2 300 1.7% 6.7% 79.0% 4.3%
Action 3 107 1.9% 5.6% 80.4% 1.9%
Action 4 51 2.0% 7.8% 84.3% 2.0%
Action 5 13 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 6 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.9% 2 of 212 office actions
All years 0.8% 12 of 1,539 office actions
Change +0.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
2014: Alice
1.1%
3.2%
4.5%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
1.5%
0.0%
1.4%
2024: AI examples
1.4%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
25.0% 1/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
25.0% 1/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
27.8 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Feb. 28, 2017 12/812,966 Affirmed §103
Jun. 14, 2016 13/076,404 Affirmed §103
Nov. 27, 2013 11/902,747 Affirmed N/A
Aug. 30, 2013 11/353,230 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.