Examiner Mary El-Shammaa

Grant ratio: 77.2% (48th percentile in Art Unit 2883 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.77. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: July 2026
Grant ratio 77.2%
Average office actions / grant 1.77
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
79728
Primary art unit
2883
Work group
2880
Technology center
2800
Applications
734
Granted applications
567
Examiner phone
(571) 272-2469
Supervisor
Thomas Hollweg
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-1739

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 21 70.9% 1.76
Group 164 64.9% 1.71
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.81 1,328 office actions across 734 applications
Applications with office actions 99.9% 733 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.1%
1 OA 385 52.5%
2 OAs 208 28.3%
3 OAs 73 9.9%
4 OAs 44 6.0%
5+ OAs 23 3.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 89.3% 2008 2009: 74.1% 2009 2010: 79.5% 2010 2011: 67.4% 2011 2012: 75.0% 2012 2013: 82.9% 2013 2014: 77.5% 2014 2015: 84.2% 2015 2016: 86.4% 2016 2017: 90.0% 2017 2018: 80.5% 2018 2019: 89.6% 2019 2020: 90.9% 2020 2021: 85.7% 2021 2022: 88.0% 2022 2023: 83.3% 2023 2024: 86.1% 2024 2025: 16.7% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008282589.3%
2009272074.1%
2010443579.5%
2011463167.4%
2012403075.0%
2013352982.9%
2014403177.5%
2015574884.2%
2016595186.4%
2017302790.0%
2018413380.5%
2019484389.6%
2020444090.9%
2021353085.7%
2022252288.0%
2023423583.3%
2024363186.1%
202536616.7%
20262100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 733 1.1% 16.9% 77.4% 1.9%
Action 2 348 0.3% 12.4% 79.9% 3.2%
Action 3 140 0.0% 10.0% 87.1% 2.1%
Action 4 67 0.0% 10.4% 88.1% 1.5%
Action 5 23 0.0% 4.3% 95.7% 0.0%
Action 6 10 0.0% 10.0% 90.0% 0.0%
Action 7 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.1% 2 of 183 office actions
All years 0.7% 9 of 1,328 office actions
Change +0.4 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
1.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
1.1%
0.9%
1.3%
4.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
1.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
1.5%
2025: August memo
1.5%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
33.3% 2/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
33.3% 2/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
21.9 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 29, 2022 15/695,842 Affirmed §103
Mar. 15, 2022 15/287,825 Reversed §102 · §103
Jun. 21, 2016 13/311,786 Reversed §103
Jan. 13, 2015 11/933,163 Affirmed N/A
Jul. 7, 2014 11/468,706 Affirmed N/A
May. 9, 2014 11/927,378 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.