Examiner Sang Nguyen

Grant ratio: 83.7% (68th percentile in Art Unit 2886 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.35. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 83.7%
Average office actions / grant 1.35
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
77347
Primary art unit
2886
Work group
2880
Technology center
2800
Applications
1,501
Granted applications
1,257
Examiner phone
(571) 272-2425
Supervisor
Michelle Iacoletti
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-5789

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 17 77.1% 1.61
Group 164 64.6% 1.71
Tech Center 2,428 61.6% 1.69
USPTO 16,572 52.1% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.34 2,012 office actions across 1,501 applications
Applications with office actions 99.7% 1,496 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 5 0.3%
1 OA 1,121 74.7%
2 OAs 283 18.9%
3 OAs 55 3.7%
4 OAs 29 1.9%
5+ OAs 8 0.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 85.0% 2008 2009: 82.4% 2009 2010: 81.4% 2010 2011: 86.9% 2011 2012: 87.3% 2012 2013: 89.3% 2013 2014: 85.3% 2014 2015: 87.2% 2015 2016: 92.7% 2016 2017: 94.4% 2017 2018: 91.7% 2018 2019: 91.3% 2019 2020: 93.5% 2020 2021: 92.5% 2021 2022: 94.1% 2022 2023: 86.6% 2023 2024: 92.9% 2024 2025: 52.2% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008605185.0%
2009857082.4%
20101028381.4%
2011998686.9%
20121028987.3%
20131039289.3%
2014756485.3%
2015786887.2%
2016827692.7%
2017908594.4%
2018847791.7%
2019807391.3%
2020625893.5%
2021676292.5%
2022686494.1%
2023675886.6%
2024706592.9%
2025693652.2%
20265800.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,496 6.1% 5.9% 78.1% 6.1%
Action 2 375 1.6% 3.2% 89.6% 0.8%
Action 3 92 2.2% 3.3% 91.3% 0.0%
Action 4 37 0.0% 2.7% 91.9% 0.0%
Action 5 8 0.0% 0.0% 87.5% 0.0%
Action 6 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.1% 3 of 263 office actions
All years 4.9% 99 of 2,012 office actions
Change -3.8 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-02–2026-10-02. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

5.2%
3.6%
3.8%
2.4%
8.7%
8.3%
2014: Alice
5.6%
7.1%
8.5%
5.8%
7.9%
2019: PEG
5.9%
2.2%
5.2%
3.3%
2.3%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
1.2%
1.5%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 3. Merits outcomes: 0 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
100.0% 3/3 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
100.0% 3/3 decisions
Median appeal duration
10.8 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 9, 2021 16/025,520 Reversed §102 · §103
Sep. 21, 2018 14/280,343 Reversed §103
Aug. 26, 2014 12/896,149 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 9, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.