Examiner Gordon J. Stock, Jr

Grant ratio: 76.5% (56th percentile in Art Unit 2886 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.64. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: September 2026
Grant ratio 76.5%
Average office actions / grant 1.64
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
79296
Primary art unit
2886
Work group
2880
Technology center
2800
Applications
993
Granted applications
760
Examiner phone
(571) 272-2431

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 17 77.1% 1.61
Group 164 64.6% 1.71
Tech Center 2,428 61.6% 1.69
USPTO 16,572 52.1% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.68 1,669 office actions across 993 applications
Applications with office actions 99.9% 992 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.1%
1 OA 544 54.8%
2 OAs 310 31.2%
3 OAs 82 8.3%
4 OAs 35 3.5%
5+ OAs 21 2.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 64.8% 2008 2009: 74.6% 2009 2010: 70.5% 2010 2011: 81.5% 2011 2012: 78.1% 2012 2013: 82.7% 2013 2014: 77.8% 2014 2015: 83.1% 2015 2016: 82.5% 2016 2017: 89.7% 2017 2018: 95.0% 2018 2019: 86.5% 2019 2020: 84.2% 2020 2021: 81.0% 2021 2022: 85.0% 2022 2023: 93.9% 2023 2024: 87.8% 2024 2025: 43.2% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008543564.8%
2009675074.6%
2010614370.5%
2011655381.5%
2012645078.1%
2013524382.7%
2014544277.8%
2015655483.1%
2016635282.5%
2017393589.7%
2018605795.0%
2019524586.5%
2020383284.2%
2021423481.0%
2022403485.0%
2023494693.9%
2024413687.8%
2025441943.2%
20264300.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 992 2.9% 5.2% 52.4% 32.6%
Action 2 448 1.6% 11.2% 59.8% 23.7%
Action 3 138 0.7% 5.8% 73.9% 19.6%
Action 4 56 0.0% 3.6% 83.9% 10.7%
Action 5 21 0.0% 9.5% 61.9% 28.6%
Action 6 9 0.0% 11.1% 66.7% 22.2%
Action 7 4 0.0% 25.0% 75.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 2.4% 5 of 211 office actions
All years 2.2% 37 of 1,669 office actions
Change +0.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-02–2026-10-02. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.9%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
1.0%
2.5%
2014: Alice
2.0%
1.0%
6.8%
8.5%
2.6%
2019: PEG
1.5%
7.8%
1.6%
1.4%
2.5%
2024: AI examples
2.9%
2025: August memo
3.0%
2.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 1. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/1 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/1 decisions
Median appeal duration
11.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jul. 28, 2017 13/959,621 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 9, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.