Examiner Daniel Walsh

Grant ratio: 56.8% (39th percentile in Art Unit 2887 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.01. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 56.8%
Average office actions / grant 2.01
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
78601
Primary art unit
2887
Work group
2880
Technology center
2800
Applications
882
Granted applications
501
Examiner phone
(571) 272-2409
Supervisor
Steven Paik
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-2404

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 19 61.6% 1.88
Group 164 64.9% 1.71
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.41 2,124 office actions across 882 applications
Applications with office actions 99.9% 881 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.1%
1 OA 384 43.5%
2 OAs 234 26.5%
3 OAs 98 11.1%
4 OAs 85 9.6%
5+ OAs 80 9.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 56.8% 2008 2009: 69.2% 2009 2010: 71.4% 2010 2011: 77.3% 2011 2012: 77.2% 2012 2013: 83.3% 2013 2014: 71.4% 2014 2015: 54.8% 2015 2016: 47.9% 2016 2017: 70.0% 2017 2018: 69.5% 2018 2019: 62.8% 2019 2020: 76.0% 2020 2021: 69.8% 2021 2022: 58.7% 2022 2023: 50.0% 2023 2024: 49.2% 2024 2025: 11.8% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008372156.8%
2009392769.2%
2010282071.4%
2011443477.3%
2012574477.2%
2013423583.3%
2014352571.4%
2015311754.8%
2016482347.9%
2017402870.0%
2018594169.5%
2019432762.8%
2020503876.0%
2021433069.8%
2022462758.7%
2023502550.0%
2024613049.2%
202576911.8%
20265300.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 881 2.4% 0.8% 90.0% 2.3%
Action 2 497 4.4% 0.4% 90.9% 1.6%
Action 3 263 6.8% 0.4% 89.0% 1.5%
Action 4 165 9.1% 0.0% 85.5% 1.8%
Action 5 80 8.8% 0.0% 85.0% 2.5%
Action 6 58 6.9% 0.0% 91.4% 1.7%
Action 7 40 5.0% 0.0% 95.0% 0.0%
Action 8 33 6.1% 0.0% 93.9% 0.0%
Action 9 24 0.0% 0.0% 95.8% 4.2%
Action 10 21 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 8.7% 32 of 366 office actions
All years 4.3% 91 of 2,124 office actions
Change +4.5 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

4.2%
1.3%
0.0%
1.4%
0.0%
0.9%
2014: Alice
0.8%
1.7%
1.3%
7.6%
10.1%
2019: PEG
7.1%
5.2%
1.9%
2.9%
3.6%
2024: AI examples
6.9%
2025: August memo
9.7%
12.5%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 6 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
14.3% 1/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
14.3% 1/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
20.8 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jan. 12, 2026 18/140,550 Affirmed §101 · §103
Dec. 2, 2022 16/544,225 Affirmed §101 · §103
Feb. 9, 2021 15/897,367 Reversed §102 · §103 · §112
Mar. 2, 2020 14/297,809 Affirmed §101
Jun. 10, 2016 13/341,072 Affirmed §103
Apr. 8, 2016 13/374,184 Affirmed §103 · §112
Dec. 18, 2013 11/273,471 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.