Examiner Tae Kim

Grant ratio: 51.9% (24th percentile in Art Unit 2887 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 3.33. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 51.9%
Average office actions / grant 3.33
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
81020
Primary art unit
2887
Work group
2880
Technology center
2800
Applications
368
Granted applications
191
Examiner phone
(571) 272-5971
Supervisor
Steven S Paik
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-2404

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 19 61.6% 1.88
Group 164 64.9% 1.71
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 3.14 1,157 office actions across 368 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 368 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 121 32.9%
2 OAs 98 26.6%
3 OAs 47 12.8%
4 OAs 36 9.8%
5+ OAs 66 17.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 50.0% 2008 2009: 45.2% 2009 2010: 75.0% 2010 2011: 47.6% 2011 2012: 38.1% 2012 2013: 58.3% 2013 2014: 70.4% 2014 2015: 66.7% 2015 2016: 31.3% 2016 2017: 73.3% 2017 2018: 56.0% 2018 2019: 56.0% 2019 2020: 75.0% 2020 2021: 84.2% 2021 2022: 45.5% 2022 2023: 40.0% 2023 2024: 54.5% 2024 2025: 33.3% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008241250.0%
2009311445.2%
201012975.0%
2011211047.6%
201221838.1%
201312758.3%
2014271970.4%
2015211466.7%
201616531.3%
2017151173.3%
2018251456.0%
2019251456.0%
202012975.0%
2021191684.2%
2022221045.5%
202315640.0%
202411654.5%
202521733.3%
20261800.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 368 0.3% 7.6% 86.4% 4.1%
Action 2 247 0.4% 3.6% 87.0% 8.1%
Action 3 149 0.7% 2.7% 87.9% 8.1%
Action 4 102 2.0% 1.0% 90.2% 4.9%
Action 5 66 1.5% 3.0% 89.4% 6.1%
Action 6 52 3.8% 1.9% 78.8% 15.4%
Action 7 39 0.0% 0.0% 82.1% 17.9%
Action 8 27 0.0% 0.0% 96.3% 3.7%
Action 9 20 0.0% 0.0% 85.0% 10.0%
Action 10 13 0.0% 0.0% 92.3% 7.7%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 2.9% 3 of 104 office actions
All years 0.7% 8 of 1,157 office actions
Change +2.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

1.4%
0.0%
0.0%
1.7%
0.0%
1.8%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.8%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
6.9%
2025: August memo
2.5%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 9. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
44.4% 4/9 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
55.6% 5/9 decisions
Median appeal duration
21.6 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 11, 2025 16/435,874 Reversed §103
Jun. 4, 2021 11/693,049 Affirmed §103
Dec. 10, 2020 16/179,507 Reversed §103
Oct. 31, 2018 12/870,174 Affirmed §103
Sep. 24, 2018 14/508,166 Affirmed §103
Aug. 30, 2016 11/659,953 Affirmed in part §102 · §103 · §112
Jul. 23, 2015 12/245,182 Reversed N/A
Jun. 29, 2012 11/068,381 Affirmed §102 · §103
Mar. 12, 2012 11/035,802 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.