Examiner Christle I. Marshall

Grant ratio: 76.6% (76th percentile in Art Unit 2887 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.53. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 76.6%
Average office actions / grant 1.53
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
83734
Primary art unit
2887
Work group
2880
Technology center
2800
Applications
817
Granted applications
626
Examiner phone
(571) 270-3086

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 19 61.6% 1.88
Group 164 64.9% 1.71
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.53 1,251 office actions across 817 applications
Applications with office actions 99.9% 816 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.1%
1 OA 536 65.6%
2 OAs 198 24.2%
3 OAs 41 5.0%
4 OAs 21 2.6%
5+ OAs 20 2.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 48.3% 2008 2009: 60.9% 2009 2010: 67.3% 2010 2011: 80.4% 2011 2012: 73.0% 2012 2013: 93.3% 2013 2014: 86.5% 2014 2015: 87.5% 2015 2016: 86.7% 2016 2017: 83.7% 2017 2018: 83.3% 2018 2019: 87.2% 2019 2020: 92.9% 2020 2021: 78.4% 2021 2022: 68.2% 2022 2023: 70.0% 2023 2024: 100.0% 2024 2025: 42.4% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008291448.3%
2009462860.9%
2010493367.3%
2011564580.4%
2012634673.0%
2013605693.3%
2014524586.5%
2015564987.5%
2016605286.7%
2017433683.7%
2018544583.3%
2019474187.2%
2020423992.9%
2021372978.4%
2022221568.2%
2023302170.0%
20241818100.0%
2025331442.4%
20262000.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 816 2.8% 25.1% 46.8% 5.1%
Action 2 280 2.1% 18.9% 59.3% 4.3%
Action 3 82 1.2% 14.6% 72.0% 6.1%
Action 4 41 0.0% 19.5% 63.4% 9.8%
Action 5 20 0.0% 15.0% 70.0% 10.0%
Action 6 8 0.0% 37.5% 50.0% 0.0%
Action 7 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 2.0% 2 of 102 office actions
All years 2.4% 30 of 1,251 office actions
Change -0.4 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

2.5%
1.3%
2.5%
1.2%
3.0%
2.1%
2014: Alice
0.0%
1.3%
3.3%
4.3%
7.4%
2019: PEG
2.9%
3.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
4.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
4.5%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 9. Merits outcomes: 7 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
22.2% 2/9 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
22.2% 2/9 decisions
Median appeal duration
27.0 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 28, 2025 17/058,930 Affirmed §103
Jan. 27, 2020 15/174,184 Reversed §102
Apr. 19, 2016 13/462,675 Affirmed N/A
Jul. 10, 2015 12/617,274 Reversed N/A
May. 14, 2014 11/994,879 Affirmed §103
Apr. 15, 2014 11/121,318 Affirmed N/A
Feb. 26, 2013 11/290,729 Affirmed N/A
May. 11, 2012 11/470,880 Affirmed §103
Apr. 24, 2012 11/564,408 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.