Examiner Christopher Stanford

Grant ratio: 48.4% (18th percentile in Art Unit 2887 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.45. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 48.4%
Average office actions / grant 2.45
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
86655
Primary art unit
2887
Work group
2880
Technology center
2800
Applications
793
Granted applications
384
Examiner phone
(571) 270-3337
Supervisor
Ricky Mack
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-2333

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 19 61.6% 1.88
Group 164 64.9% 1.71
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.66 2,109 office actions across 793 applications
Applications with office actions 99.6% 790 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 3 0.4%
1 OA 243 30.6%
2 OAs 241 30.4%
3 OAs 125 15.8%
4 OAs 93 11.7%
5+ OAs 88 11.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2009: 28.0% 2009 2010: 62.5% 2010 2011: 59.0% 2011 2012: 54.5% 2012 2013: 47.3% 2013 2014: 64.6% 2014 2015: 37.5% 2015 2016: 28.9% 2016 2017: 48.7% 2017 2018: 64.9% 2018 2019: 56.8% 2019 2020: 66.0% 2020 2021: 54.8% 2021 2022: 64.3% 2022 2023: 57.1% 2023 2024: 60.4% 2024 2025: 30.2% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200925728.0%
2010402562.5%
2011392359.0%
2012442454.5%
2013552647.3%
2014483164.6%
2015321237.5%
2016381128.9%
2017391948.7%
2018372464.9%
2019442556.8%
2020533566.0%
2021422354.8%
2022422764.3%
2023422457.1%
2024533260.4%
2025531630.2%
20266700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 790 0.1% 17.6% 74.4% 6.8%
Action 2 547 0.2% 10.4% 80.8% 8.0%
Action 3 306 0.7% 6.2% 87.3% 5.6%
Action 4 181 1.1% 5.5% 85.6% 7.7%
Action 5 88 1.1% 4.5% 87.5% 6.8%
Action 6 66 0.0% 1.5% 95.5% 3.0%
Action 7 39 0.0% 7.7% 87.2% 5.1%
Action 8 25 0.0% 8.0% 88.0% 4.0%
Action 9 13 0.0% 7.7% 92.3% 0.0%
Action 10 11 0.0% 9.1% 81.8% 9.1%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 364 office actions
All years 0.3% 7 of 2,109 office actions
Change -0.3 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.6%
0.0%
0.6%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
0.9%
2.8%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 6 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
12.5% 1/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
25.0% 2/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
24.8 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 31, 2019 14/338,320 Affirmed §101 · §103 · §120
May. 6, 2019 14/611,320 Affirmed §102 · §103 · §112
Mar. 2, 2016 11/751,770 Affirmed §103
May. 6, 2015 12/646,193 Affirmed N/A
Sep. 26, 2014 12/004,359 Affirmed §103
Aug. 19, 2014 11/629,893 Affirmed in part N/A
May. 29, 2014 11/930,308 Affirmed §103
Mar. 25, 2014 11/866,430 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.