Examiner Priya M Rampersaud

Grant ratio: 61.4% (41st percentile in Art Unit 2891 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.11. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 61.4%
Average office actions / grant 2.11
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
89037
Primary art unit
2891
Work group
2890
Technology center
2800
Applications
306
Granted applications
188
Examiner phone
(571) 272-3464
Supervisor
Chad Dicke
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-7996

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 28 55.9% 1.85
Group 288 53.7% 1.76
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.34 716 office actions across 306 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 306 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 127 41.5%
2 OAs 88 28.8%
3 OAs 25 8.2%
4 OAs 39 12.7%
5+ OAs 27 8.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2012: 100.0% 2012 2013: 66.7% 2013 2014: 50.0% 2014 2015: 42.1% 2015 2016: 54.5% 2016 2017: 55.6% 2017 2018: 76.9% 2018 2019: 73.7% 2019 2020: 62.5% 2020 2021: 75.0% 2021 2022: 76.0% 2022 2023: 80.8% 2023 2024: 81.8% 2024 2025: 48.3% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201211100.0%
2013302066.7%
201412650.0%
201519842.1%
2016221254.5%
2017181055.6%
2018262076.9%
2019191473.7%
2020161062.5%
2021201575.0%
2022251976.0%
2023262180.8%
2024221881.8%
2025291448.3%
20262100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 306 0.0% 9.2% 81.0% 4.9%
Action 2 179 0.6% 21.8% 71.5% 4.5%
Action 3 91 0.0% 11.0% 83.5% 3.3%
Action 4 66 0.0% 10.6% 84.8% 3.0%
Action 5 27 0.0% 3.7% 96.3% 0.0%
Action 6 21 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 13 0.0% 7.7% 92.3% 0.0%
Action 8 7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 138 office actions
All years 0.1% 1 of 716 office actions
Change -0.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
2.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 0 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 5 reversed.

Full reversal rate
100.0% 5/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
100.0% 5/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
9.4 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jul. 28, 2026 17/653,669 Reversed §102 · §103 · §112
Dec. 2, 2022 15/138,683 Reversed N/A
Jun. 28, 2019 13/411,849 Reversed N/A
Nov. 17, 2016 13/265,282 Reversed §112
Aug. 4, 2016 13/277,642 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.