Examiner Ermias Woldegeorgis

Grant ratio: 61.3% (51st percentile in Art Unit 2893 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.73. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 61.3%
Average office actions / grant 2.73
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
85098
Primary art unit
2893
Work group
2890
Technology center
2800
Applications
833
Granted applications
511
Examiner phone
(571) 270-5350

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 48 48.5% 1.70
Group 297 52.1% 1.76
Tech Center 2,435 61.3% 1.69
USPTO 16,620 51.8% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.76 2,298 office actions across 833 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 833 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 251 30.1%
2 OAs 242 29.1%
3 OAs 119 14.3%
4 OAs 92 11.0%
5+ OAs 129 15.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 11.1% 2008 2009: 35.7% 2009 2010: 50.0% 2010 2011: 48.8% 2011 2012: 47.6% 2012 2013: 70.6% 2013 2014: 68.5% 2014 2015: 76.3% 2015 2016: 81.8% 2016 2017: 85.7% 2017 2018: 82.9% 2018 2019: 76.4% 2019 2020: 86.8% 2020 2021: 89.5% 2021 2022: 87.5% 2022 2023: 87.2% 2023 2024: 73.2% 2024 2025: 35.8% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200818211.1%
2009421535.7%
2010381950.0%
2011412048.8%
2012422047.6%
2013513670.6%
2014543768.5%
2015382976.3%
2016443681.8%
2017423685.7%
2018413482.9%
2019554276.4%
2020383386.8%
2021383489.5%
2022322887.5%
2023474187.2%
2024413073.2%
2025531935.8%
20267800.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 833 0.2% 9.5% 87.8% 1.3%
Action 2 582 0.0% 6.2% 92.4% 0.9%
Action 3 340 0.3% 3.8% 95.0% 0.3%
Action 4 221 0.0% 4.5% 94.6% 0.9%
Action 5 129 0.0% 3.1% 96.1% 0.8%
Action 6 77 0.0% 1.3% 96.1% 1.3%
Action 7 46 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 29 0.0% 0.0% 96.6% 3.4%
Action 9 18 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 11 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.5% 2 of 369 office actions
All years 0.1% 3 of 2,298 office actions
Change +0.4 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-23–2026-10-23. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.9%
0.8%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
42.9% 3/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
57.1% 4/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
30.2 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jan. 23, 2015 11/815,007 Affirmed N/A
Nov. 25, 2013 11/805,693 Affirmed in part N/A
Oct. 29, 2013 12/034,603 Reversed N/A
Jul. 29, 2013 11/756,217 Reversed N/A
May. 23, 2013 11/951,525 Affirmed §103
Sep. 11, 2012 11/691,167 Reversed §102 · §103
Jun. 21, 2012 11/601,266 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 30, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.