Examiner Caleb Henry

Grant ratio: 77.5% (69th percentile in Art Unit 2894 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.65. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 77.5%
Average office actions / grant 1.65
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
85158
Primary art unit
2894
Work group
2890
Technology center
2800
Applications
1,296
Granted applications
1,004
Examiner phone
(571) 270-5370
Supervisor
Eva Montalvo
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-3829

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 19 68.0% 1.95
Group 297 52.1% 1.76
Tech Center 2,435 61.3% 1.69
USPTO 16,620 51.8% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.66 2,155 office actions across 1,296 applications
Applications with office actions 99.5% 1,290 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 6 0.5%
1 OA 786 60.6%
2 OAs 320 24.7%
3 OAs 94 7.3%
4 OAs 45 3.5%
5+ OAs 45 3.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 58.8% 2008 2009: 58.8% 2009 2010: 50.0% 2010 2011: 53.3% 2011 2012: 61.4% 2012 2013: 76.1% 2013 2014: 91.2% 2014 2015: 91.6% 2015 2016: 94.9% 2016 2017: 89.2% 2017 2018: 96.9% 2018 2019: 97.3% 2019 2020: 95.2% 2020 2021: 92.0% 2021 2022: 98.6% 2022 2023: 100.0% 2023 2024: 95.0% 2024 2025: 40.3% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008171058.8%
2009342058.8%
2010442250.0%
2011452453.3%
2012835161.4%
2013886776.1%
2014918391.2%
2015837691.6%
2016797594.9%
2017655889.2%
2018646296.9%
2019747297.3%
2020837995.2%
2021878092.0%
2022696898.6%
20236969100.0%
2024605795.0%
2025773140.3%
20268400.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,290 1.4% 28.4% 65.8% 0.9%
Action 2 504 0.4% 18.5% 77.8% 0.6%
Action 3 184 0.0% 9.2% 88.0% 0.0%
Action 4 90 0.0% 4.4% 93.3% 0.0%
Action 5 45 0.0% 11.1% 84.4% 0.0%
Action 6 29 0.0% 3.4% 93.1% 0.0%
Action 7 9 0.0% 0.0% 88.9% 0.0%
Action 8 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.4% 1 of 274 office actions
All years 0.9% 20 of 2,155 office actions
Change -0.6 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-23–2026-10-23. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
2014: Alice
0.9%
2.6%
0.8%
0.0%
10.0%
2019: PEG
1.8%
0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
1.2%
2024: AI examples
1.3%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
25.0% 1/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 2/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
25.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 18, 2024 16/953,529 Affirmed §103
May. 20, 2016 12/743,772 Affirmed in part §103
Jun. 27, 2014 11/379,469 Reversed N/A
Mar. 28, 2014 11/518,818 Affirmed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 30, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.