AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Anna J. Burmeister

Appears inactive Last observed office action: June 2010 (190 months ago).

Examiner Anna J. Burmeister appears to be more difficult than most of their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 91.9%, they average 1.23 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by §112 and elevated §112 usage.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.23
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
3 years (2008-2010)
Tech Center
2900 - Designs
Group
2900-WG - 2900-WG

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
62
Granted Applications
57
Non-Granted Applications
5
Avg OA / Grant
1.23
Last OA Observed
June 2010 (190 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2916 , 2917
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 91.9% 1.23
Art Unit 30 96.3% 1.23
Group 461 95.1% 1.19
Tech Center 486 94.9% 1.20
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 28 26 92.9%
2009 26 23 88.5%
2010 8 8 100.0%
No observed data after 2010; examiner may have gone inactive or moved out of examining work.

57 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 62 0.0% 0.0% 3.2% 80.6%
2 14 0.0% 0.0% 7.1% 78.6%
3 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0%