Examiner Christine Dang

Grant ratio: 36.0% (30th percentile in Art Unit 2199 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 3.00. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 36.0%
Average office actions / grant 3.00
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87859
Primary art unit
2199
Work group
2190
Technology center
3600
Applications
211
Granted applications
76
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1322
Supervisor
Patrick Mcatee
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7575

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 23 51.7% 2.32
Group 238 52.6% 2.03
Tech Center 2,381 46.2% 2.12
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.72 574 office actions across 211 applications
Applications with office actions 97.2% 205 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 6 2.8%
1 OA 49 23.2%
2 OAs 52 24.6%
3 OAs 39 18.5%
4 OAs 41 19.4%
5+ OAs 24 11.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 37.5% 2011 2012: 45.0% 2012 2013: 50.0% 2013 2014: 70.6% 2014 2015: 56.5% 2015 2016: 100.0% 2016 2022: 0.0% 2022 2023: 31.3% 2023 2024: 42.3% 2024 2025: 11.5% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20118337.5%
201220945.0%
2013301550.0%
2014171270.6%
2015231356.5%
201655100.0%
2022200.0%
202316531.3%
2024261142.3%
202526311.5%
20263800.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 205 1.0% 4.4% 93.2% 0.5%
Action 2 156 1.9% 4.5% 93.6% 0.0%
Action 3 104 1.0% 2.9% 94.2% 1.0%
Action 4 65 3.1% 0.0% 95.4% 1.5%
Action 5 24 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 4.2%
Action 6 12 8.3% 0.0% 83.3% 0.0%
Action 7 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 3.0% 7 of 237 office actions
All years 1.6% 9 of 574 office actions
Change +1.4 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
1.2%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
20.0%
0.0%
1.5%
2024: AI examples
2.6%
2025: August memo
3.4%
1.9%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
25.0% 1/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 2/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
29.7 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
May. 27, 2026 18/067,518 Affirmed §103
Feb. 16, 2016 11/688,090 Reversed §103
Sep. 11, 2015 11/486,879 Affirmed N/A
Mar. 30, 2015 11/733,596 Affirmed in part N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.