Examiner Paul Chenevert

Grant ratio: 69.9% (33rd percentile in Art Unit 3612 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.59. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: February 2018
Grant ratio 69.9%
Average office actions / grant 1.59
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
76410
Primary art unit
3612
Work group
3610
Technology center
3600
Applications
471
Granted applications
329

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 35 54.1% 1.37
Group 162 58.7% 1.45
Tech Center 2,381 46.2% 2.12
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.67 807 office actions across 484 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 484 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 271 56.0%
2 OAs 150 31.0%
3 OAs 31 6.4%
4 OAs 23 4.8%
5+ OAs 9 1.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 71.7% 2008 2009: 65.0% 2009 2010: 71.2% 2010 2011: 68.1% 2011 2012: 56.0% 2012 2013: 70.6% 2013 2014: 71.4% 2014 2015: 78.6% 2015 2016: 74.5% 2016 2017: 73.8% 2017 2018: 100.0% 2018

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008533871.7%
2009603965.0%
2010594271.2%
2011473268.1%
2012502856.0%
2013342470.6%
2014282071.4%
2015423378.6%
2016554174.5%
2017423173.8%
201811100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 484 0.2% 16.7% 77.3% 4.5%
Action 2 213 0.5% 13.1% 78.4% 6.6%
Action 3 63 1.6% 3.2% 88.9% 6.3%
Action 4 32 0.0% 3.1% 90.6% 6.3%
Action 5 9 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 6 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.4% 3 of 807 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
0.0%
2.2%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 12. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 4 affirmed in part, and 6 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 6/12 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
83.3% 10/12 decisions
Median appeal duration
27.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Nov. 9, 2017 13/288,298 Affirmed in part §100 · §102 · §103 · §112 · §120
Oct. 24, 2017 14/186,378 Affirmed in part §103
Sep. 11, 2017 12/847,288 Reversed §103
Oct. 22, 2015 12/306,108 Reversed N/A
Jul. 23, 2015 12/756,788 Reversed §102
Feb. 13, 2015 12/481,738 Reversed N/A
Sep. 27, 2013 11/767,358 Affirmed in part N/A
Apr. 11, 2012 10/531,679 Affirmed §103
Dec. 15, 2011 11/480,618 Affirmed in part §103
Nov. 3, 2011 11/872,628 Reversed N/A
Aug. 1, 2011 11/227,208 Reversed §103
Jan. 13, 2011 11/836,398 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.