Examiner Anthony D Wiest

Grant ratio: 68.1% (50th percentile in Art Unit 3617 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.40. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 68.1%
Average office actions / grant 1.40
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87440
Primary art unit
3617
Work group
3610
Technology center
3600
Applications
933
Granted applications
635
Examiner phone
(571) 270-5974
Supervisor
Samuel Morano
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-6684

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 23 66.8% 1.55
Group 162 58.7% 1.45
Tech Center 2,381 46.2% 2.12
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.40 1,305 office actions across 933 applications
Applications with office actions 99.9% 932 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.1%
1 OA 670 71.8%
2 OAs 183 19.6%
3 OAs 56 6.0%
4 OAs 16 1.7%
5+ OAs 7 0.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 41.7% 2011 2012: 63.2% 2012 2013: 59.6% 2013 2014: 64.3% 2014 2015: 70.0% 2015 2016: 63.5% 2016 2017: 75.7% 2017 2018: 74.0% 2018 2019: 75.3% 2019 2020: 81.3% 2020 2021: 84.4% 2021 2022: 81.4% 2022 2023: 80.8% 2023 2024: 68.8% 2024 2025: 51.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2011361541.7%
2012573663.2%
2013472859.6%
2014704564.3%
2015604270.0%
2016744763.5%
2017745675.7%
2018735474.0%
2019775875.3%
2020645281.3%
2021645484.4%
2022594881.4%
2023524280.8%
2024483368.8%
2025492551.0%
20262900.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 932 0.0% 4.7% 71.5% 19.6%
Action 2 262 0.0% 6.1% 86.6% 5.7%
Action 3 79 0.0% 1.3% 84.8% 7.6%
Action 4 23 0.0% 0.0% 95.7% 0.0%
Action 5 7 0.0% 14.3% 85.7% 0.0%
Action 6 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 159 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 1,305 office actions
Change 0.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
66.7% 4/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
83.3% 5/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
21.2 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Apr. 16, 2021 15/598,466 Reversed §103
Feb. 26, 2020 12/993,642 Affirmed in part §103 · §112
Oct. 31, 2019 14/764,367 Reversed §103
Sep. 16, 2016 13/201,871 Affirmed §103
Feb. 29, 2016 13/292,147 Reversed §103
Nov. 26, 2013 12/591,662 Reversed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.