Examiner Alfred H Tsui

Grant ratio: 20.6% (33rd percentile in Art Unit 3621 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 5.07. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 20.6%
Average office actions / grant 5.07
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
90648
Primary art unit
3621
Work group
3620
Technology center
3600
Applications
281
Granted applications
58
Examiner phone
(571) 272-9511
Supervisor
Rutao Wu
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-3136

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 24 23.3% 3.54
Group 364 26.3% 2.84
Tech Center 2,394 45.5% 2.12
USPTO 16,620 51.8% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 3.10 960 office actions across 310 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 310 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 105 33.9%
2 OAs 67 21.6%
3 OAs 30 9.7%
4 OAs 41 13.2%
5+ OAs 67 21.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2013: 50.0% 2013 2014: 0.0% 2014 2015: 5.0% 2015 2016: 20.0% 2016 2017: 27.8% 2017 2018: 33.3% 2018 2019: 33.3% 2019 2020: 44.0% 2020 2021: 47.1% 2021 2022: 26.7% 2022 2023: 26.3% 2023 2024: 20.0% 2024 2025: 26.7% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20132150.0%
2014700.0%
20152015.0%
201615320.0%
201718527.8%
201815533.3%
20196233.3%
2020251144.0%
202117847.1%
202215426.7%
202319526.3%
202425520.0%
202530826.7%
20266700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 310 1.0% 8.7% 87.1% 1.3%
Action 2 205 2.9% 4.4% 90.2% 0.5%
Action 3 138 5.1% 1.4% 90.6% 1.4%
Action 4 108 6.5% 0.9% 89.8% 1.9%
Action 5 67 11.9% 1.5% 82.1% 4.5%
Action 6 48 12.5% 0.0% 83.3% 2.1%
Action 7 29 6.9% 0.0% 86.2% 6.9%
Action 8 21 9.5% 0.0% 81.0% 9.5%
Action 9 11 0.0% 0.0% 81.8% 18.2%
Action 10 8 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 25.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 6.4% 17 of 265 office actions
All years 4.6% 44 of 960 office actions
Change +1.8 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-23–2026-10-23. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
11.1%
2014: Alice
2.1%
0.0%
4.4%
1.4%
1.5%
2019: PEG
4.9%
4.2%
7.5%
8.7%
4.2%
2024: AI examples
13.0%
2025: August memo
8.3%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
33.3% 2/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
33.3% 2/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
14.9 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 9, 2025 16/899,434 Affirmed §101 · §103
Jul. 30, 2021 13/957,381 Reversed §103
Feb. 21, 2020 13/606,909 Reversed §101 · §103
Jun. 3, 2019 14/048,622 Affirmed §101 · §103
Feb. 28, 2019 13/158,355 Affirmed §101 · §103
Jun. 27, 2018 13/667,084 Affirmed §101

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 30, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.