Examiner Sarjit S Bains

Grant ratio: 14.8% (17th percentile in Art Unit 3623 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 4.39. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 14.8%
Average office actions / grant 4.39
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
91672
Primary art unit
3623
Work group
3620
Technology center
3600
Applications
223
Granted applications
33
Examiner phone
(571) 270-0317
Supervisor
Wu Rutao
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-6045

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 43 27.3% 2.96
Group 364 26.5% 2.85
Tech Center 2,381 46.2% 2.12
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 3.23 721 office actions across 223 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 223 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 45 20.2%
2 OAs 53 23.8%
3 OAs 31 13.9%
4 OAs 52 23.3%
5+ OAs 42 18.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2014: 0.0% 2014 2015: 0.0% 2015 2016: 0.0% 2016 2017: 8.7% 2017 2018: 21.4% 2018 2019: 22.2% 2019 2020: 26.5% 2020 2021: 29.4% 2021 2022: 38.5% 2022 2023: 15.4% 2023 2024: 6.7% 2024 2025: 10.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2014200.0%
20151500.0%
20161300.0%
20172328.7%
201814321.4%
201918422.2%
202034926.5%
202117529.4%
202213538.5%
202313215.4%
20241516.7%
202520210.0%
20262600.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 223 3.6% 3.6% 92.4% 0.0%
Action 2 178 50.0% 1.1% 47.8% 0.6%
Action 3 125 45.6% 0.0% 53.6% 0.0%
Action 4 94 43.6% 0.0% 54.3% 0.0%
Action 5 42 38.1% 2.4% 57.1% 0.0%
Action 6 31 29.0% 0.0% 71.0% 0.0%
Action 7 15 40.0% 0.0% 60.0% 0.0%
Action 8 8 50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%
Action 9 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 58.1% 108 of 186 office actions
All years 31.9% 230 of 721 office actions
Change +26.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

2014: Alice
0.0%
15.7%
25.0%
18.9%
16.1%
2019: PEG
31.3%
27.9%
21.4%
14.6%
37.9%
2024: AI examples
49.3%
2025: August memo
63.3%
73.5%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
11.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 4, 2026 17/489,386 Affirmed §101 · §103
Oct. 23, 2024 16/347,833 Affirmed §101 · §103
Sep. 27, 2024 16/404,422 Affirmed §101
May. 31, 2024 16/659,109 Affirmed §101
Jul. 26, 2023 14/978,450 Affirmed §101 · §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.