AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Naresh Vig

Examiner Naresh Vig appears to be about average relative to their peer examiners. Their lifetime grant ratio is 33.4%, they average 2.87 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by §103 and occasional §101 rejections.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group About Average
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 2.87
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
19 years (2008-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-6810
Predicted Supervisor
Ilana Spar
Supervisor Phone
(571) 270-7537
Tech Center
3600 - Transportation, Electronic Commerce, Construction, Agriculture, Licensing and Review
Group
3620 - Business Methods: Incentive Programs, POS, Inventory, Accounting, Shipping

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
653
Granted Applications
218
Non-Granted Applications
435
Avg OA / Grant
2.87
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (0 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3622 , 3629 , 3688
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 33.4% 2.87
Art Unit 28 15.9% 3.43
Group 362 27.1% 2.85
Tech Center 2,337 48.0% 2.11
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 41 7 17.1%
2009 40 17 42.5%
2010 41 10 24.4%
2011 43 7 16.3%
2012 35 15 42.9%
2013 37 15 40.5%
2014 15 2 13.3%
2015 48 2 4.2%
2016 28 0 0.0%
No observed data for 2017.
2018 20 5 25.0%
2019 40 21 52.5%
2020 55 34 61.8%
2021 33 25 75.8%
2022 40 23 57.5%
2023 44 27 61.4%
2024 25 8 32.0%
2025 42 0 0.0%
2026 26 0 0.0%

218 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 631 2.2% 2.4% 88.3% 1.6%
2 389 21.9% 0.5% 69.2% 5.1%
3 229 27.1% 0.0% 64.2% 5.7%
4 148 24.3% 1.4% 64.9% 8.1%
5 82 20.7% 1.2% 67.1% 8.5%
6 55 16.4% 1.8% 69.1% 10.9%
7 35 20.0% 0.0% 65.7% 11.4%
8 17 5.9% 0.0% 76.5% 11.8%
9 8 25.0% 0.0% 62.5% 12.5%
10 5 20.0% 0.0% 40.0% 40.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
1.1%
2008
0.0%
2009
0.0%
2010
0.0%
2011
0.0%
2012
0.0%
2013
10.1%
2014
3.2%
2015
12.8%
2016
9.1%
2017
13.3%
2018
22.4%
2019
23.8%
2020
31.8%
2021
22.1%
2022
25.6%
2023
23.0%
2024
43.6%
2025
46.2%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.