Examiner Gwendolyn Baxter

Grant ratio: 73.9% (83rd percentile in Art Unit 3632 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.66. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: January 2020
Grant ratio 73.9%
Average office actions / grant 1.66
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
72542
Primary art unit
3632
Work group
3630
Technology center
3600
Applications
563
Granted applications
416

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 25 57.5% 1.65
Group 182 51.6% 1.79
Tech Center 2,381 46.2% 2.12
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.63 934 office actions across 573 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 573 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 328 57.2%
2 OAs 171 29.8%
3 OAs 47 8.2%
4 OAs 19 3.3%
5+ OAs 8 1.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 55.0% 2008 2009: 63.6% 2009 2010: 66.7% 2010 2011: 59.1% 2011 2012: 51.6% 2012 2013: 66.7% 2013 2014: 90.2% 2014 2015: 81.9% 2015 2016: 86.9% 2016 2017: 75.9% 2017 2018: 82.7% 2018 2019: 75.0% 2019 2020: 100.0% 2020

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008201155.0%
2009221463.6%
2010271866.7%
2011221359.1%
2012623251.6%
2013694666.7%
2014615590.2%
2015725981.9%
2016615386.9%
2017584475.9%
2018524382.7%
2019362775.0%
202011100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 573 0.3% 17.6% 40.8% 30.9%
Action 2 245 0.0% 17.6% 50.6% 18.8%
Action 3 74 0.0% 17.6% 56.8% 14.9%
Action 4 27 0.0% 14.8% 66.7% 3.7%
Action 5 8 0.0% 0.0% 62.5% 12.5%
Action 6 6 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0%
Action 7 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.2% 2 of 934 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
3.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
42.9% 3/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
71.4% 5/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
26.4 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Oct. 28, 2016 13/614,688 Reversed §102 · §103 · §112
Sep. 28, 2016 13/256,615 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
May. 10, 2016 13/123,802 Reversed New ground of rejection §102 · §103 · §112
Apr. 6, 2016 12/321,283 Affirmed §103
Aug. 31, 2015 11/665,504 Affirmed N/A
Sep. 25, 2013 10/904,729 Affirmed in part §100 · §103 · §112
May. 29, 2013 11/308,300 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.