Examiner Ingrid Weinhold

Grant ratio: 45.4% (8th percentile in Art Unit 3632 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.94. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 45.4%
Average office actions / grant 1.94
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
78858
Primary art unit
3632
Work group
3630
Technology center
3600
Applications
529
Granted applications
240
Examiner phone
(571) 272-8822
Supervisor
Robert Kim
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-2293

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 25 57.5% 1.65
Group 182 51.6% 1.79
Tech Center 2,381 46.2% 2.12
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.90 1,005 office actions across 529 applications
Applications with office actions 99.6% 527 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 2 0.4%
1 OA 231 43.7%
2 OAs 184 34.8%
3 OAs 68 12.9%
4 OAs 26 4.9%
5+ OAs 18 3.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 29.8% 2011 2012: 41.9% 2012 2013: 44.1% 2013 2014: 35.3% 2014 2015: 35.1% 2015 2016: 39.5% 2016 2017: 28.6% 2017 2018: 61.0% 2018 2019: 61.3% 2019 2020: 64.3% 2020 2021: 53.8% 2021 2022: 52.6% 2022 2023: 63.3% 2023 2024: 70.6% 2024 2025: 44.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2011471429.8%
2012311341.9%
2013341544.1%
2014341235.3%
2015371335.1%
2016381539.5%
201728828.6%
2018412561.0%
2019311961.3%
2020281864.3%
2021261453.8%
2022382052.6%
2023301963.3%
2024342470.6%
2025251144.0%
20262700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 527 0.2% 6.6% 66.4% 24.9%
Action 2 296 0.0% 4.4% 64.5% 30.7%
Action 3 112 0.0% 1.8% 71.4% 24.1%
Action 4 44 0.0% 0.0% 68.2% 31.8%
Action 5 18 0.0% 0.0% 61.1% 33.3%
Action 6 7 0.0% 0.0% 85.7% 14.3%
Action 7 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.7% 1 of 151 office actions
All years 0.1% 1 of 1,005 office actions
Change +0.6 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
2.1%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 3. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/3 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
33.3% 1/3 decisions
Median appeal duration
29.5 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Apr. 7, 2015 12/771,855 Affirmed in part New ground of rejection N/A
Dec. 23, 2014 11/573,822 Affirmed N/A
Oct. 10, 2014 12/186,150 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.