Examiner David M. Purol

Grant ratio: 56.1% (75th percentile in Art Unit 3634 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.66. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: March 2017
Grant ratio 56.1%
Average office actions / grant 1.66
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
64246
Primary art unit
3634
Work group
3630
Technology center
3600
Applications
704
Granted applications
395

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 30 46.9% 1.92
Group 184 50.8% 1.79
Tech Center 2,390 45.7% 2.12
USPTO 16,572 52.1% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.62 1,141 office actions across 705 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 705 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 428 60.7%
2 OAs 174 24.7%
3 OAs 61 8.7%
4 OAs 32 4.5%
5+ OAs 10 1.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 18.6% 2008 2009: 51.2% 2009 2010: 59.2% 2010 2011: 53.1% 2011 2012: 61.3% 2012 2013: 64.2% 2013 2014: 66.7% 2014 2015: 64.6% 2015 2016: 70.3% 2016 2017: 100.0% 2017

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008861618.6%
2009864451.2%
2010764559.2%
2011814353.1%
2012804961.3%
2013815264.2%
2014785266.7%
2015654264.6%
2016644570.3%
201777100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 705 0.0% 5.7% 86.0% 6.2%
Action 2 277 0.0% 3.2% 91.0% 4.0%
Action 3 103 0.0% 2.9% 85.4% 7.8%
Action 4 42 0.0% 0.0% 92.9% 4.8%
Action 5 10 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 6 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 1,141 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-02–2026-10-02. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 16. Merits outcomes: 7 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 6 reversed.

Full reversal rate
40.0% 6/15 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
53.3% 8/15 decisions
Median appeal duration
26.7 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jan. 31, 2017 12/302,348 Affirmed in part §103
Jun. 20, 2016 13/424,004 Affirmed §103
Apr. 18, 2016 12/325,944 Reversed §103
Jan. 29, 2014 12/015,124 Affirmed in part §103
Sep. 17, 2013 11/434,337 Affirmed §102 · §103 · §112
Jul. 24, 2013 12/186,084 Reversed §103
Jul. 3, 2013 11/003,296 Reversed N/A
Apr. 17, 2013 11/316,074 Affirmed §103 · §112
Sep. 28, 2012 11/096,784 Affirmed §103
Sep. 24, 2012 11/096,783 Affirmed §103 · §112
Aug. 31, 2012 12/690,538 Reversed §103
Aug. 27, 2012 11/348,024 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 9, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.