Examiner Justin B Rephann

Grant ratio: 73.5% (94th percentile in Art Unit 3634 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.36. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: September 2026
Grant ratio 73.5%
Average office actions / grant 1.36
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87378
Primary art unit
3634
Work group
3630
Technology center
3600
Applications
989
Granted applications
727
Examiner phone
(571) 270-7318
Supervisor
Daniel Cahn
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-5616

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 30 46.9% 1.92
Group 184 50.8% 1.79
Tech Center 2,390 45.7% 2.12
USPTO 16,572 52.1% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.41 1,391 office actions across 989 applications
Applications with office actions 99.7% 986 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 3 0.3%
1 OA 688 69.6%
2 OAs 231 23.4%
3 OAs 41 4.1%
4 OAs 16 1.6%
5+ OAs 10 1.0%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2010: 100.0% 2010 2011: 75.6% 2011 2012: 74.7% 2012 2013: 78.3% 2013 2014: 68.3% 2014 2015: 62.1% 2015 2016: 75.6% 2016 2017: 89.7% 2017 2018: 80.8% 2018 2019: 82.5% 2019 2020: 83.0% 2020 2021: 80.6% 2021 2022: 75.7% 2022 2023: 87.1% 2023 2024: 83.1% 2024 2025: 50.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201011100.0%
2011413175.6%
2012755674.7%
2013604778.3%
2014634368.3%
2015583662.1%
2016866575.6%
2017585289.7%
2018786380.8%
2019635282.5%
2020534483.0%
2021625080.6%
2022745675.7%
2023625487.1%
2024715983.1%
2025361850.0%
20264800.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 986 0.0% 0.8% 58.1% 28.3%
Action 2 298 0.0% 0.3% 73.5% 16.8%
Action 3 67 0.0% 1.5% 70.1% 17.9%
Action 4 26 0.0% 0.0% 80.8% 11.5%
Action 5 10 0.0% 0.0% 80.0% 10.0%
Action 6 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 248 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 1,391 office actions
Change 0.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-02–2026-10-02. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
25.0% 1/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 2/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
26.5 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 29, 2018 14/006,399 Affirmed §103 · §112
Oct. 12, 2016 12/872,186 Affirmed in part New ground of rejection N/A
Jun. 20, 2016 12/784,260 Reversed §102 · §103 · §112
Dec. 16, 2014 12/389,624 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 9, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.