Examiner Shiref M Mekhaeil

Grant ratio: 56.1% (71st percentile in Art Unit 3634 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.24. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 56.1%
Average office actions / grant 2.24
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
88704
Primary art unit
3634
Work group
3630
Technology center
3600
Applications
631
Granted applications
354
Examiner phone
(571) 270-5334
Supervisor
Daniel Cahn
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-5616

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 30 46.9% 1.92
Group 184 50.8% 1.79
Tech Center 2,390 45.7% 2.12
USPTO 16,572 52.1% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.24 1,411 office actions across 631 applications
Applications with office actions 98.4% 621 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 10 1.6%
1 OA 218 34.5%
2 OAs 208 33.0%
3 OAs 98 15.5%
4 OAs 55 8.7%
5+ OAs 42 6.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2012: 42.9% 2012 2013: 50.0% 2013 2014: 62.5% 2014 2015: 66.7% 2015 2016: 69.6% 2016 2017: 69.8% 2017 2018: 52.2% 2018 2019: 69.4% 2019 2020: 68.2% 2020 2021: 60.0% 2021 2022: 65.0% 2022 2023: 80.6% 2023 2024: 60.6% 2024 2025: 19.6% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20127342.9%
2013582950.0%
2014402562.5%
2015392666.7%
2016463269.6%
2017533769.8%
2018462452.2%
2019624369.4%
2020443068.2%
2021352160.0%
2022402665.0%
2023362980.6%
2024332060.6%
202546919.6%
20264600.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 621 0.2% 6.6% 75.0% 17.6%
Action 2 403 0.0% 7.7% 74.4% 16.1%
Action 3 195 0.0% 4.1% 83.1% 12.8%
Action 4 97 0.0% 2.1% 82.5% 15.5%
Action 5 42 2.4% 4.8% 85.7% 7.1%
Action 6 28 0.0% 0.0% 85.7% 14.3%
Action 7 12 0.0% 0.0% 91.7% 8.3%
Action 8 7 0.0% 28.6% 71.4% 28.6%
Action 9 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 273 office actions
All years 0.1% 2 of 1,411 office actions
Change -0.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-02–2026-10-02. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 4/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
75.0% 6/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
20.3 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 16, 2025 17/829,835 Affirmed §103
Dec. 20, 2024 16/124,248 Affirmed §102 · §103 · §112
Jan. 16, 2019 14/529,274 Reversed §102 · §103 · §112
Jul. 27, 2018 13/554,442 Affirmed in part §103 · §112
Sep. 13, 2016 13/457,653 Reversed §103
Aug. 29, 2016 12/954,227 Affirmed in part §103
Aug. 15, 2016 13/009,236 Reversed §103
Aug. 15, 2016 13/296,572 Reversed §100 · §102 · §103 · §112 · §120

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 9, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.