Examiner Abe L Massad

Grant ratio: 51.6% (48th percentile in Art Unit 3634 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.89. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 51.6%
Average office actions / grant 1.89
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
89104
Primary art unit
3634
Work group
3630
Technology center
3600
Applications
797
Granted applications
411
Examiner phone
(571) 272-6292
Supervisor
Daniel Cahn
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-5616

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 30 46.9% 1.92
Group 184 50.8% 1.79
Tech Center 2,390 45.7% 2.12
USPTO 16,572 52.1% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.82 1,451 office actions across 797 applications
Applications with office actions 97.0% 773 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 24 3.0%
1 OA 383 48.1%
2 OAs 243 30.5%
3 OAs 67 8.4%
4 OAs 51 6.4%
5+ OAs 29 3.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 100.0% 2011 2012: 50.0% 2012 2013: 44.4% 2013 2014: 60.8% 2014 2015: 54.3% 2015 2016: 57.4% 2016 2017: 60.3% 2017 2018: 67.2% 2018 2019: 60.6% 2019 2020: 53.4% 2020 2021: 55.8% 2021 2022: 46.8% 2022 2023: 53.6% 2023 2024: 57.6% 2024 2025: 33.3% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201111100.0%
201212650.0%
2013452044.4%
2014513160.8%
2015462554.3%
2016613557.4%
2017684160.3%
2018614167.2%
2019664060.6%
2020583153.4%
2021522955.8%
2022622946.8%
2023563053.6%
2024593457.6%
2025541833.3%
20264500.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 773 0.1% 5.6% 87.3% 5.6%
Action 2 390 0.0% 28.2% 60.5% 9.5%
Action 3 147 0.0% 14.3% 73.5% 10.9%
Action 4 80 0.0% 2.5% 86.3% 10.0%
Action 5 29 0.0% 3.4% 82.8% 10.3%
Action 6 17 0.0% 5.9% 88.2% 5.9%
Action 7 5 0.0% 0.0% 80.0% 20.0%
Action 8 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 33.3%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 252 office actions
All years 0.1% 1 of 1,451 office actions
Change -0.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-02–2026-10-02. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
33.3% 2/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
33.3% 2/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
10.4 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 25, 2025 17/875,804 Reversed §103
Aug. 29, 2025 15/930,677 Affirmed §103
Nov. 22, 2024 16/022,235 Affirmed §103
Mar. 17, 2020 15/159,780 Affirmed §103
Oct. 2, 2019 14/645,229 Affirmed §102 · §103 · §112
May. 1, 2015 12/184,287 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 9, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.