Examiner Joseph F. Edell

Grant ratio: 22.7% (10th percentile in Art Unit 3636 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.13. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 22.7%
Average office actions / grant 2.13
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
75077
Primary art unit
3636
Work group
3630
Technology center
3600
Applications
207
Granted applications
47
Examiner phone
(571) 272-6858
Supervisor
Namrata Boveja
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-8105

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 26 60.5% 1.69
Group 182 51.6% 1.79
Tech Center 2,381 46.2% 2.12
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.88 389 office actions across 207 applications
Applications with office actions 96.1% 199 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 8 3.9%
1 OA 82 39.6%
2 OAs 69 33.3%
3 OAs 28 13.5%
4 OAs 15 7.2%
5+ OAs 5 2.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 44.4% 2008 2009: 12.5% 2009 2010: 10.3% 2010 2011: 0.0% 2011 2012: 66.7% 2012 2013: 42.9% 2013 2014: 11.8% 2014 2015: 9.1% 2015 2016: 29.2% 2016 2017: 46.7% 2017 2018: 100.0% 2018 2020: 100.0% 2020 2024: 66.7% 2024 2025: 33.3% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20089444.4%
200940512.5%
201039410.3%
2011400.0%
20123266.7%
201314642.9%
201417211.8%
20151119.1%
201624729.2%
201715746.7%
201811100.0%
202022100.0%
20243266.7%
202512433.3%
20261300.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 199 0.0% 15.6% 75.9% 9.0%
Action 2 117 0.9% 9.4% 82.1% 6.0%
Action 3 48 0.0% 0.0% 89.6% 10.4%
Action 4 20 0.0% 0.0% 85.0% 15.0%
Action 5 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 33 office actions
All years 0.3% 1 of 389 office actions
Change -0.3 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 12. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 7 reversed.

Full reversal rate
58.3% 7/12 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
66.7% 8/12 decisions
Median appeal duration
26.7 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 22, 2018 14/177,736 Affirmed §103
Mar. 28, 2018 12/994,658 Affirmed §102 · §103 · §112
Aug. 9, 2017 14/066,895 Affirmed §102 · §103
Aug. 4, 2016 13/947,787 Reversed §102 · §103
May. 10, 2016 13/152,653 Reversed §103
May. 10, 2016 13/152,667 Reversed §103
Jun. 20, 2013 10/587,218 Reversed §102 · §103
Apr. 26, 2013 11/771,423 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Mar. 27, 2013 11/149,437 Reversed N/A
Feb. 28, 2013 11/559,337 Reversed §112
Dec. 13, 2011 11/095,887 Reversed §103
Jun. 24, 2011 11/530,067 Affirmed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.