Examiner Jeanette E. Chapman

Grant ratio: 74.3% (94th percentile in Art Unit 3638 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.81. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: September 2020
Grant ratio 74.3%
Average office actions / grant 1.81
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
66554
Primary art unit
3638
Work group
3630
Technology center
3600
Applications
1,051
Granted applications
781

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 8 59.9% 1.81
Group 182 51.6% 1.79
Tech Center 2,381 46.2% 2.12
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.79 1,894 office actions across 1,061 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 1,061 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 579 54.6%
2 OAs 285 26.9%
3 OAs 109 10.3%
4 OAs 52 4.9%
5+ OAs 36 3.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 32.9% 2008 2009: 56.2% 2009 2010: 68.9% 2010 2011: 72.9% 2011 2012: 71.6% 2012 2013: 76.1% 2013 2014: 81.6% 2014 2015: 76.1% 2015 2016: 82.7% 2016 2017: 87.0% 2017 2018: 91.8% 2018 2019: 79.5% 2019 2020: 87.2% 2020

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008732432.9%
2009895056.2%
2010906268.9%
2011705172.9%
2012956871.6%
2013715476.1%
2014877181.6%
2015675176.1%
20161109182.7%
2017776787.0%
2018978991.8%
2019786279.5%
2020474187.2%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,061 0.8% 8.5% 75.5% 5.8%
Action 2 482 0.6% 7.5% 77.6% 4.4%
Action 3 197 0.5% 7.1% 75.6% 3.0%
Action 4 88 1.1% 9.1% 73.9% 1.1%
Action 5 36 0.0% 8.3% 80.6% 2.8%
Action 6 16 0.0% 18.8% 68.8% 6.3%
Action 7 8 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 5 0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.7% 14 of 1,894 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.6%
0.6%
2.2%
0.7%
1.4%
2014: Alice
0.0%
1.7%
0.5%
0.8%
0.0%
2019: PEG
1.6%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 12. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 5 affirmed in part, and 6 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 6/12 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
91.7% 11/12 decisions
Median appeal duration
25.7 months
New grounds of rejection
3
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jul. 8, 2021 15/622,138 Reversed §103 · §112
Jul. 24, 2020 14/160,835 Reversed §103
Dec. 31, 2019 15/178,640 Reversed §103
Sep. 3, 2019 13/966,897 Affirmed in part §103
Feb. 28, 2017 13/136,983 Affirmed §103
Jan. 28, 2016 10/714,143 Affirmed in part New ground of rejection N/A
Dec. 10, 2015 13/086,025 Affirmed in part New ground of rejection §103
Nov. 6, 2013 10/726,341 Reversed N/A
Sep. 19, 2013 12/500,005 Affirmed in part §103 · §112
Apr. 26, 2013 10/233,670 Reversed N/A
Mar. 14, 2013 10/513,672 Affirmed in part New ground of rejection §103 · §112
Feb. 12, 2010 11/117,135 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.