Examiner Daniel J. Troy

Grant ratio: 53.6% (3rd percentile in Art Unit 3641 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.12. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 53.6%
Average office actions / grant 2.12
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
84583
Primary art unit
3641
Work group
3640
Technology center
3600
Applications
291
Granted applications
156
Examiner phone
(571) 270-3742
Supervisor
Daniel Troy
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-3742

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 23 65.9% 1.60
Group 281 52.9% 1.75
Tech Center 2,381 46.2% 2.12
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.05 618 office actions across 301 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 301 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 136 45.2%
2 OAs 80 26.6%
3 OAs 45 15.0%
4 OAs 26 8.6%
5+ OAs 14 4.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2007: 16.7% 2007 2008: 53.8% 2008 2009: 58.7% 2009 2010: 60.0% 2010 2011: 55.6% 2011 2012: 59.0% 2012 2013: 57.6% 2013 2014: 76.5% 2014 2015: 100.0% 2015 2016: 66.7% 2016 2017: 0.0% 2017 2018: 0.0% 2018 2025: 18.2% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20076116.7%
2008261453.8%
2009462758.7%
2010352160.0%
2011362055.6%
2012613659.0%
2013331957.6%
2014171376.5%
201511100.0%
20163266.7%
2017200.0%
2018200.0%
202511218.2%
20261200.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 301 0.7% 12.3% 74.4% 9.3%
Action 2 165 0.0% 8.5% 81.2% 8.5%
Action 3 85 0.0% 10.6% 77.6% 7.1%
Action 4 40 0.0% 2.5% 90.0% 7.5%
Action 5 14 0.0% 7.1% 85.7% 7.1%
Action 6 6 0.0% 0.0% 83.3% 16.7%
Action 7 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 29 office actions
All years 0.3% 2 of 618 office actions
Change -0.3 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
1.2%
0.0%
1.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
37.5% 3/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
37.5% 3/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
24.7 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 28, 2018 13/618,160 Reversed §103 · §112
Sep. 17, 2018 14/775,850 Reversed §103 · §112
Aug. 29, 2018 14/530,216 Affirmed §103 · §112
Apr. 30, 2014 12/134,671 Affirmed §102 · §112
Sep. 3, 2013 11/426,802 Reversed N/A
Aug. 26, 2013 11/477,554 Affirmed N/A
Oct. 30, 2012 11/307,304 Affirmed §103
Mar. 28, 2011 10/906,190 Affirmed §102

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.