Examiner Sean P. Burke

Grant ratio: 63.8% (55th percentile in Art Unit 3646 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.66. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: June 2017
Grant ratio 63.8%
Average office actions / grant 2.66
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
88511
Primary art unit
3646
Work group
3640
Technology center
3600
Applications
301
Granted applications
192

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 29 57.9% 1.86
Group 281 52.9% 1.75
Tech Center 2,381 46.2% 2.12
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.55 776 office actions across 304 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 304 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 77 25.3%
2 OAs 108 35.5%
3 OAs 53 17.4%
4 OAs 37 12.2%
5+ OAs 29 9.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2009: 100.0% 2009 2010: 80.0% 2010 2011: 100.0% 2011 2012: 57.7% 2012 2013: 55.7% 2013 2014: 74.6% 2014 2015: 78.6% 2015 2016: 46.3% 2016 2017: 86.4% 2017

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200922100.0%
20105480.0%
201144100.0%
2012261557.7%
2013613455.7%
2014594474.6%
2015423378.6%
2016803746.3%
2017221986.4%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 304 1.6% 8.6% 85.9% 3.3%
Action 2 227 0.9% 4.4% 87.2% 5.3%
Action 3 119 0.8% 3.4% 83.2% 9.2%
Action 4 66 6.1% 1.5% 80.3% 12.1%
Action 5 29 3.4% 6.9% 72.4% 13.8%
Action 6 13 0.0% 7.7% 84.6% 7.7%
Action 7 10 0.0% 0.0% 90.0% 10.0%
Action 8 6 0.0% 0.0% 83.3% 16.7%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 1.7% 13 of 776 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
3.3%
2.9%
2.7%
2.9%
2014: Alice
1.3%
1.0%
0.7%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 38. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 7 affirmed in part, and 26 reversed.

Full reversal rate
68.4% 26/38 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
86.8% 33/38 decisions
Median appeal duration
27.3 months
New grounds of rejection
3
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Oct. 28, 2020 13/798,418 Affirmed §103
Sep. 23, 2019 14/057,922 Reversed §103 · §112
Sep. 28, 2018 13/197,836 Affirmed §101 · §102 · §112
Aug. 10, 2018 12/887,933 Reversed §103 · §112
Jul. 31, 2018 13/156,544 Reversed §103
Jul. 19, 2018 13/914,661 Reversed §103
Jul. 16, 2018 13/885,582 Affirmed §103
Jun. 5, 2018 13/563,527 Reversed §103
May. 31, 2018 13/217,323 Reversed §103
Aug. 28, 2017 13/477,244 Affirmed §103 · §112
May. 25, 2017 12/154,712 Reversed New ground of rejection §101 · §103 · §112
May. 18, 2017 12/847,843 Reversed §101 · §102 · §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.