Examiner Leslie A. Nicholson Iii

Grant ratio: 84.5% (86th percentile in Art Unit 3651 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.47. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 84.5%
Average office actions / grant 1.47
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
81166
Primary art unit
3651
Work group
3650
Technology center
3600
Applications
1,365
Granted applications
1,153
Examiner phone
(571) 272-5487
Supervisor
Michael C Mccullough
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7805

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 27 65.5% 1.67
Group 255 56.6% 1.70
Tech Center 2,381 46.2% 2.12
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.48 2,021 office actions across 1,365 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 1,365 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 882 64.6%
2 OAs 356 26.1%
3 OAs 90 6.6%
4 OAs 29 2.1%
5+ OAs 8 0.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 88.0% 2008 2009: 83.3% 2009 2010: 89.2% 2010 2011: 78.8% 2011 2012: 78.8% 2012 2013: 91.1% 2013 2014: 86.9% 2014 2015: 91.8% 2015 2016: 93.1% 2016 2017: 97.7% 2017 2018: 91.8% 2018 2019: 88.3% 2019 2020: 83.8% 2020 2021: 96.7% 2021 2022: 95.4% 2022 2023: 90.8% 2023 2024: 90.4% 2024 2025: 68.7% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008837388.0%
20091089083.3%
20101119989.2%
2011997878.8%
20121048278.8%
2013797291.1%
2014847386.9%
2015615691.8%
2016292793.1%
2017444397.7%
2018857891.8%
2019605388.3%
2020685783.8%
2021605896.7%
2022656295.4%
2023655990.8%
2024524790.4%
2025674668.7%
20264100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,365 0.8% 30.2% 47.5% 21.2%
Action 2 483 0.2% 22.8% 60.9% 15.9%
Action 3 127 0.0% 16.5% 66.9% 15.7%
Action 4 37 0.0% 10.8% 62.2% 24.3%
Action 5 8 0.0% 25.0% 75.0% 0.0%
Action 6 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.4% 1 of 237 office actions
All years 0.6% 12 of 2,021 office actions
Change -0.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.5%
0.5%
1.0%
0.0%
0.6%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
1.7%
1.9%
2019: PEG
1.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.3%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
2.1%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
66.7% 4/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
83.3% 5/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
22.9 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 24, 2017 13/573,024 Affirmed §103
Aug. 3, 2017 13/994,263 Reversed §103
Sep. 14, 2016 13/258,652 Reversed §112
Apr. 14, 2014 12/290,618 Affirmed in part §102
Feb. 3, 2012 11/442,726 Reversed §102 · §103
Jul. 29, 2009 11/122,808 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.