Examiner Michael K. Collins

Grant ratio: 67.5% (34th percentile in Art Unit 3651 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.41. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 67.5%
Average office actions / grant 2.41
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
82253
Primary art unit
3651
Work group
3650
Technology center
3600
Applications
1,208
Granted applications
816
Examiner phone
(571) 272-8970
Supervisor
Jacob Scott
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-3415

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 27 65.5% 1.67
Group 255 56.6% 1.70
Tech Center 2,381 46.2% 2.12
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.30 2,784 office actions across 1,208 applications
Applications with office actions 99.8% 1,206 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 2 0.2%
1 OA 511 42.3%
2 OAs 305 25.2%
3 OAs 162 13.4%
4 OAs 113 9.4%
5+ OAs 115 9.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 45.5% 2008 2009: 64.0% 2009 2010: 68.5% 2010 2011: 49.3% 2011 2012: 50.7% 2012 2013: 64.9% 2013 2014: 58.9% 2014 2015: 63.6% 2015 2016: 74.3% 2016 2017: 79.0% 2017 2018: 81.2% 2018 2019: 80.3% 2019 2020: 84.4% 2020 2021: 93.0% 2021 2022: 83.8% 2022 2023: 84.4% 2023 2024: 82.3% 2024 2025: 42.6% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008663045.5%
2009754864.0%
2010735068.5%
2011733649.3%
2012673450.7%
2013573764.9%
2014734358.9%
2015553563.6%
2016705274.3%
2017624979.0%
2018695681.2%
2019614980.3%
2020645484.4%
2021575393.0%
2022746283.8%
2023645484.4%
2024625182.3%
2025542342.6%
20263200.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,206 0.7% 27.3% 56.7% 5.8%
Action 2 695 0.1% 25.0% 65.0% 5.9%
Action 3 390 0.5% 24.9% 67.7% 5.4%
Action 4 228 0.4% 29.8% 63.2% 4.4%
Action 5 115 0.9% 30.4% 58.3% 7.8%
Action 6 66 0.0% 22.7% 71.2% 4.5%
Action 7 42 0.0% 16.7% 78.6% 2.4%
Action 8 25 0.0% 32.0% 68.0% 0.0%
Action 9 10 0.0% 40.0% 50.0% 10.0%
Action 10 4 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.3% 3 of 229 office actions
All years 0.5% 13 of 2,784 office actions
Change +0.8 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.4%
0.4%
0.0%
0.6%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.9%
1.1%
0.9%
3.4%
2024: AI examples
1.1%
2025: August memo
1.4%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 21. Merits outcomes: 9 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 11 reversed.

Full reversal rate
52.4% 11/21 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
57.1% 12/21 decisions
Median appeal duration
25.7 months
New grounds of rejection
3
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jan. 14, 2020 13/100,595 Reversed §103
Nov. 1, 2018 12/603,809 Reversed N/A
Sep. 14, 2018 12/940,618 Reversed N/A
Aug. 27, 2018 13/683,987 Reversed §102
Jul. 24, 2018 13/330,871 Affirmed §103
May. 29, 2018 14/625,763 Affirmed §102
Nov. 29, 2017 12/759,189 Affirmed §103
Sep. 29, 2017 13/365,962 Reversed §102
Aug. 24, 2016 11/780,809 Affirmed §102 · §112
Jul. 28, 2016 13/085,416 Reversed New ground of rejection §102 · §103
Sep. 28, 2015 13/523,629 Reversed N/A
Sep. 23, 2015 12/187,666 Affirmed New ground of rejection N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.