Examiner Kavel Singh

Grant ratio: 79.1% (58th percentile in Art Unit 3651 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.86. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 79.1%
Average office actions / grant 1.86
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
82767
Primary art unit
3651
Work group
3650
Technology center
3600
Applications
1,356
Granted applications
1,073
Examiner phone
(571) 272-2362
Supervisor
Gene Crawford
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-6911

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 27 65.5% 1.67
Group 255 56.6% 1.70
Tech Center 2,381 46.2% 2.12
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.87 2,533 office actions across 1,356 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 1,356 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 604 44.5%
2 OAs 497 36.7%
3 OAs 135 10.0%
4 OAs 91 6.7%
5+ OAs 29 2.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 56.8% 2008 2009: 65.8% 2009 2010: 76.2% 2010 2011: 69.1% 2011 2012: 80.2% 2012 2013: 86.8% 2013 2014: 74.2% 2014 2015: 89.9% 2015 2016: 82.6% 2016 2017: 90.1% 2017 2018: 88.6% 2018 2019: 91.4% 2019 2020: 95.2% 2020 2021: 91.4% 2021 2022: 85.9% 2022 2023: 90.4% 2023 2024: 91.1% 2024 2025: 55.6% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008372156.8%
2009795265.8%
2010634876.2%
2011684769.1%
2012816580.2%
2013685986.8%
2014624674.2%
2015696289.9%
2016463882.6%
2017817390.1%
2018797088.6%
20191059691.4%
2020848095.2%
2021817491.4%
2022645585.9%
2023837590.4%
2024797291.1%
2025724055.6%
20265500.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,356 0.6% 19.2% 74.9% 4.2%
Action 2 752 0.1% 16.5% 78.2% 4.5%
Action 3 255 0.4% 13.3% 81.6% 3.9%
Action 4 120 0.0% 15.0% 80.8% 4.2%
Action 5 29 0.0% 10.3% 86.2% 3.4%
Action 6 15 0.0% 6.7% 93.3% 0.0%
Action 7 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 33.3%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.3% 1 of 340 office actions
All years 0.4% 10 of 2,533 office actions
Change -0.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
1.2%
0.9%
2014: Alice
0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
0.9%
0.9%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
1.4%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 26. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 21 reversed.

Full reversal rate
80.8% 21/26 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
88.5% 23/26 decisions
Median appeal duration
26.9 months
New grounds of rejection
2
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Nov. 20, 2024 17/191,795 Affirmed New ground of rejection §102 · §103 · §112
Sep. 2, 2021 15/551,949 Reversed §102 · §103
Jul. 31, 2019 14/748,699 Reversed §102 · §112
Mar. 23, 2017 13/982,349 Reversed §102
Jul. 13, 2016 12/742,860 Reversed §102 · §103
Jul. 5, 2016 12/838,219 Reversed §102 · §103
Feb. 11, 2016 14/186,769 Reversed §103
Aug. 25, 2015 12/634,074 Affirmed in part N/A
Jul. 20, 2015 12/190,569 Affirmed in part N/A
May. 29, 2015 13/354,668 Reversed N/A
Mar. 24, 2015 13/186,215 Affirmed N/A
Mar. 9, 2015 12/476,659 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.