Examiner Paul T. Chin

Grant ratio: 68.7% (58th percentile in Art Unit 3652 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.37. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 68.7%
Average office actions / grant 1.37
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
76587
Primary art unit
3652
Work group
3650
Technology center
3600
Applications
1,190
Granted applications
817
Examiner phone
(571) 272-6922

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 31 57.1% 1.68
Group 255 56.6% 1.70
Tech Center 2,381 46.2% 2.12
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.39 1,653 office actions across 1,190 applications
Applications with office actions 99.7% 1,187 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 3 0.3%
1 OA 842 70.8%
2 OAs 263 22.1%
3 OAs 55 4.6%
4 OAs 20 1.7%
5+ OAs 7 0.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 43.2% 2008 2009: 62.7% 2009 2010: 67.2% 2010 2011: 59.4% 2011 2012: 80.6% 2012 2013: 77.4% 2013 2014: 73.7% 2014 2015: 62.5% 2015 2016: 67.8% 2016 2017: 74.0% 2017 2018: 75.0% 2018 2019: 84.2% 2019 2020: 83.0% 2020 2021: 83.9% 2021 2022: 74.4% 2022 2023: 92.2% 2023 2024: 86.3% 2024 2025: 47.8% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008743243.2%
20091026462.7%
2010674567.2%
2011965759.4%
2012675480.6%
2013846577.4%
2014765673.7%
2015563562.5%
2016875967.8%
2017503774.0%
2018644875.0%
2019383284.2%
2020473983.0%
2021625283.9%
2022392974.4%
2023514792.2%
2024514486.3%
2025462247.8%
20263300.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,187 0.3% 16.8% 62.4% 12.3%
Action 2 345 0.0% 11.6% 70.1% 9.9%
Action 3 82 0.0% 8.5% 70.7% 13.4%
Action 4 27 0.0% 7.4% 81.5% 7.4%
Action 5 7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 6 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0%
Action 7 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.6% 1 of 163 office actions
All years 0.2% 4 of 1,653 office actions
Change +0.4 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
3.6%
0.0%
2.3%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
1.8%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 10. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 5 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 5/10 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
60.0% 6/10 decisions
Median appeal duration
29.6 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Apr. 19, 2018 14/271,634 Reversed §102 · §103
Oct. 26, 2015 13/113,341 Affirmed in part New ground of rejection N/A
Sep. 22, 2015 12/586,480 Reversed N/A
Sep. 10, 2014 11/791,916 Reversed §102
Jul. 8, 2013 11/934,465 Affirmed N/A
Mar. 22, 2013 11/390,600 Affirmed N/A
Mar. 21, 2013 11/758,816 Reversed §103
Nov. 30, 2012 10/592,044 Affirmed N/A
Oct. 26, 2012 11/114,595 Affirmed §103
Jun. 13, 2012 10/513,938 Reversed §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.