Examiner Mark C Hageman

Grant ratio: 66.8% (42nd percentile in Art Unit 3652 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.65. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 66.8%
Average office actions / grant 1.65
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
82794
Primary art unit
3652
Work group
3650
Technology center
3600
Applications
814
Granted applications
544
Examiner phone
(571) 272-5547
Supervisor
Saul Rodriguez
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7097

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 31 57.1% 1.68
Group 255 56.6% 1.70
Tech Center 2,381 46.2% 2.12
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.60 1,305 office actions across 814 applications
Applications with office actions 99.8% 812 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 2 0.2%
1 OA 482 59.2%
2 OAs 232 28.5%
3 OAs 53 6.5%
4 OAs 34 4.2%
5+ OAs 11 1.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 49.2% 2008 2009: 60.0% 2009 2010: 100.0% 2010 2011: 50.0% 2011 2012: 0.0% 2012 2013: 0.0% 2013 2014: 34.8% 2014 2015: 61.9% 2015 2016: 66.7% 2016 2017: 84.5% 2017 2018: 78.9% 2018 2019: 80.3% 2019 2020: 77.4% 2020 2021: 86.1% 2021 2022: 79.5% 2022 2023: 82.0% 2023 2024: 86.2% 2024 2025: 49.2% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008633149.2%
2009503060.0%
201011100.0%
20112150.0%
2012100.0%
2013100.0%
201423834.8%
2015633961.9%
2016543666.7%
2017584984.5%
2018574578.9%
2019766180.3%
2020534177.4%
2021363186.1%
2022443579.5%
2023615082.0%
2024655686.2%
2025613049.2%
20264500.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 812 0.4% 15.9% 61.9% 19.8%
Action 2 330 0.3% 13.6% 70.3% 13.6%
Action 3 98 1.0% 8.2% 82.7% 7.1%
Action 4 45 0.0% 6.7% 75.6% 17.8%
Action 5 11 0.0% 0.0% 72.7% 27.3%
Action 6 6 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 33.3%
Action 7 2 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 246 office actions
All years 0.4% 5 of 1,305 office actions
Change -0.4 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.8%
4.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
2.2%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
60.0% 3/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
80.0% 4/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
28.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Feb. 10, 2026 17/843,125 Reversed §103
Nov. 27, 2018 14/316,094 Affirmed in part §103 · §112
Apr. 20, 2015 12/151,965 Reversed §102 · §103
Feb. 26, 2015 12/542,177 Reversed N/A
Sep. 29, 2014 11/908,036 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.