Examiner Nathaniel L Adams

Grant ratio: 63.2% (50th percentile in Art Unit 3654 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.21. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 63.2%
Average office actions / grant 2.21
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
89068
Primary art unit
3654
Work group
3650
Technology center
3600
Applications
562
Granted applications
355
Examiner phone
(571) 272-4830
Supervisor
Anna M Momper
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-5788

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 41 44.8% 1.78
Group 255 56.6% 1.70
Tech Center 2,381 46.2% 2.12
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.15 1,209 office actions across 562 applications
Applications with office actions 99.5% 559 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 3 0.5%
1 OA 254 45.2%
2 OAs 156 27.8%
3 OAs 57 10.1%
4 OAs 43 7.7%
5+ OAs 49 8.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2012: 40.0% 2012 2013: 48.0% 2013 2014: 41.0% 2014 2015: 62.5% 2015 2016: 58.1% 2016 2017: 60.9% 2017 2018: 57.1% 2018 2019: 80.0% 2019 2020: 76.7% 2020 2021: 78.9% 2021 2022: 87.5% 2022 2023: 91.4% 2023 2024: 93.9% 2024 2025: 51.8% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20125240.0%
2013251248.0%
2014391641.0%
2015322062.5%
2016311858.1%
2017462860.9%
2018492857.1%
2019504080.0%
2020433376.7%
2021383078.9%
2022242187.5%
2023353291.4%
2024494693.9%
2025562951.8%
20264000.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 559 0.0% 14.3% 61.7% 21.5%
Action 2 305 0.0% 11.5% 73.1% 12.5%
Action 3 149 0.0% 14.1% 79.2% 5.4%
Action 4 92 2.2% 17.4% 76.1% 3.3%
Action 5 49 0.0% 12.2% 83.7% 4.1%
Action 6 26 0.0% 19.2% 69.2% 11.5%
Action 7 18 0.0% 11.1% 88.9% 0.0%
Action 8 9 0.0% 22.2% 77.8% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.4% 1 of 272 office actions
All years 0.2% 2 of 1,209 office actions
Change +0.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
1.6%
0.0%
1.6%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
40.0% 2/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
60.0% 3/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
17.0 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jul. 30, 2019 12/976,149 Reversed §102 · §103 · §112
Jul. 25, 2019 14/279,606 Affirmed §102 · §103
Jun. 12, 2019 13/712,774 Reversed §102 · §103 · §112
Jun. 12, 2017 12/954,750 Affirmed in part §102 · §103 · §112
Jan. 30, 2017 13/580,019 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.