Examiner Tisha D Lewis

Grant ratio: 82.6% (74th percentile in Art Unit 3655 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.43. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 82.6%
Average office actions / grant 1.43
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
76219
Primary art unit
3655
Work group
3650
Technology center
3600
Applications
1,288
Granted applications
1,064
Examiner phone
(571) 272-7093
Supervisor
Anita Y Coupe
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-3614

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 32 62.3% 1.42
Group 255 56.6% 1.70
Tech Center 2,381 46.2% 2.12
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.43 1,846 office actions across 1,288 applications
Applications with office actions 99.9% 1,287 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.1%
1 OA 861 66.8%
2 OAs 341 26.5%
3 OAs 51 4.0%
4 OAs 25 1.9%
5+ OAs 9 0.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 93.1% 2008 2009: 83.9% 2009 2010: 82.3% 2010 2011: 85.9% 2011 2012: 88.6% 2012 2013: 90.9% 2013 2014: 91.5% 2014 2015: 86.9% 2015 2016: 88.1% 2016 2017: 85.9% 2017 2018: 84.7% 2018 2019: 89.5% 2019 2020: 89.3% 2020 2021: 89.0% 2021 2022: 92.4% 2022 2023: 81.3% 2023 2024: 92.3% 2024 2025: 58.9% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008585493.1%
2009877383.9%
2010796582.3%
2011857385.9%
2012797088.6%
2013666090.9%
2014595491.5%
2015615386.9%
2016675988.1%
2017716185.9%
2018726184.7%
2019766889.5%
2020756789.3%
2021736589.0%
2022666192.4%
2023483981.3%
2024524892.3%
2025563358.9%
20265800.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,287 0.2% 17.6% 50.7% 19.0%
Action 2 426 0.2% 12.2% 49.8% 29.1%
Action 3 85 0.0% 10.6% 56.5% 25.9%
Action 4 34 0.0% 5.9% 70.6% 17.6%
Action 5 9 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 33.3%
Action 6 4 0.0% 25.0% 75.0% 0.0%
Action 7 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.4% 1 of 278 office actions
All years 0.2% 4 of 1,846 office actions
Change +0.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.2%
2014: Alice
0.0%
1.3%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
1.4%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 3. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/3 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
66.7% 2/3 decisions
Median appeal duration
29.7 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 16, 2014 10/588,651 Affirmed in part New ground of rejection §102 · §103
Jul. 30, 2014 10/563,461 Affirmed §103
May. 15, 2013 11/761,041 Affirmed in part §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.