AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Colby M. Hansen

Appears inactive Last observed office action: January 2025 (17 months ago).

Examiner Colby M. Hansen appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 80.0%, they average 1.30 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile leans toward ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.30
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
14 years (2012-2025)
Tech Center
3600 - Transportation, Electronic Commerce, Construction, Agriculture, Licensing and Review
Group
3650 - Material and Article Handling

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
425
Granted Applications
340
Non-Granted Applications
85
Avg OA / Grant
1.30
Last OA Observed
January 2025 (17 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3655
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 80.0% 1.30
Art Unit 30 67.4% 1.42
Group 239 60.7% 1.70
Tech Center 2,337 48.0% 2.11
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2012; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2012 42 29 69.0%
2013 45 32 71.1%
2014 50 36 72.0%
2015 51 39 76.5%
2016 42 34 81.0%
2017 34 28 82.4%
2018 36 34 94.4%
2019 32 31 96.9%
2020 25 19 76.0%
2021 18 15 83.3%
2022 16 13 81.3%
2023 18 14 77.8%
2024 14 14 100.0%
2025 2 2 100.0%
No observed data after 2025; examiner may have gone inactive or moved out of examining work.

340 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 424 1.9% 9.4% 41.3% 13.0%
2 101 2.0% 16.8% 47.5% 8.9%
3 28 0.0% 7.1% 67.9% 14.3%
4 11 0.0% 9.1% 54.5% 9.1%
5 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
1.3%
2012
2.8%
2013
0.0%
2014
1.3%
2015
6.8%
2016
0.0%
2017
0.0%
2018
0.0%
2019
3.8%
2020
0.0%
2021
5.6%
2022
0.0%
2023
0.0%
2024
0.0%
2025

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.