AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Adam Mott

Examiner Adam Mott appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 73.6%, they average 1.67 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.67
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
15 years (2012-2026)
Phone
(571) 270-5376
Predicted Supervisor
James Trammell
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-6712
Tech Center
3600 - Transportation, Electronic Commerce, Construction, Agriculture, Licensing and Review
Group
3660 - VCaR - Robot Control, Vehicle Navigation and Data Processing: Vehicles and Relative Location

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
311
Granted Applications
229
Non-Granted Applications
82
Avg OA / Grant
1.67
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (3 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3657 , 3664 , 3667 , 3669
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 73.6% 1.67
Art Unit 54 57.8% 1.85
Group 457 55.5% 1.86
Tech Center 2,337 48.0% 2.11
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2012; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2012 12 10 83.3%
2013 34 21 61.8%
2014 23 19 82.6%
2015 31 25 80.6%
2016 40 28 70.0%
2017 40 35 87.5%
2018 37 32 86.5%
2019 38 29 76.3%
2020 35 23 65.7%
2021 6 4 66.7%
2022 3 3 100.0%
No observed data for 2023.
2024 2 0 0.0%
2025 5 0 0.0%
2026 5 0 0.0%

229 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 305 2.3% 6.6% 78.7% 7.2%
2 139 0.7% 7.9% 79.9% 5.0%
3 56 0.0% 3.6% 89.3% 3.6%
4 24 0.0% 4.2% 95.8% 0.0%
5 11 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
6 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
7 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2012
1.6%
2013
0.0%
2014
0.0%
2015
1.1%
2016
1.3%
2017
3.3%
2018
0.0%
2019
6.0%
2020
0.0%
2021
0.0%
2022
0.0%
2024
0.0%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.