AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Hana Lee

Examiner Hana Lee appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 43.3%, they average 2.32 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 2.32
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
7 years (2020-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-5277
Predicted Supervisor
Jelani Smith
Supervisor Phone
(571) 270-3969
Tech Center
3600 - Transportation, Electronic Commerce, Construction, Agriculture, Licensing and Review
Group
3660 - VCaR - Robot Control, Vehicle Navigation and Data Processing: Vehicles and Relative Location

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
180
Granted Applications
78
Non-Granted Applications
102
Avg OA / Grant
2.32
Last OA Observed
June 2026 (1 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3662
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 43.3% 2.32
Art Unit 50 55.8% 1.96
Group 455 54.8% 1.86
Tech Center 2,366 46.9% 2.11
USPTO 16,347 53.5% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2020; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2020 1 0 0.0%
2021 24 14 58.3%
2022 29 17 58.6%
2023 28 20 71.4%
2024 29 18 62.1%
2025 37 9 24.3%
2026 32 0 0.0%

78 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 180 2.8% 4.4% 83.3% 5.6%
2 125 1.6% 3.2% 91.2% 2.4%
3 69 1.4% 1.4% 95.7% 1.4%
4 44 2.3% 0.0% 95.5% 0.0%
5 14 0.0% 0.0% 85.7% 14.3%
6 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
7 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2020
2.8%
2021
0.0%
2022
2.8%
2023
3.6%
2024
2.2%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.