AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Dylan M Katz

Examiner Dylan M Katz appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 64.7%, they average 1.72 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU About Average
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.72
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
7 years (2020-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-2776
Predicted Supervisor
N/A
Supervisor Phone
N/A
Tech Center
3600 - Transportation, Electronic Commerce, Construction, Agriculture, Licensing and Review
Group
3660 - VCaR - Robot Control, Vehicle Navigation and Data Processing: Vehicles and Relative Location

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
334
Granted Applications
216
Non-Granted Applications
118
Avg OA / Grant
1.72
Last OA Observed
June 2026 (1 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3657 , 3664 , 3666
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 64.7% 1.72
Art Unit 74 60.3% 1.72
Group 455 54.8% 1.86
Tech Center 2,366 46.9% 2.11
USPTO 16,347 53.5% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2020; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2020 4 3 75.0%
2021 36 29 80.6%
2022 51 47 92.2%
2023 46 42 91.3%
2024 71 56 78.9%
2025 87 39 44.8%
2026 39 0 0.0%

216 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 334 2.4% 4.8% 85.3% 4.2%
2 143 0.7% 1.4% 93.7% 2.1%
3 54 0.0% 0.0% 98.1% 1.9%
4 22 0.0% 0.0% 95.5% 4.5%
5 13 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
6 8 0.0% 0.0% 87.5% 12.5%
7 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
8 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2020
3.4%
2021
0.0%
2022
1.2%
2023
2.2%
2024
1.5%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.